Understanding the Nuances: The Quantity and Quality of Learner Feedback in Second‐Language Pronunciation

ABSTRACT This study investigated the feedback behaviors of Chinese learners of English in second‐language (L2) pronunciation. Online written peer and self‐feedback guided by a feedback form were collected from 179 undergraduate‐level English learners over eight weeks. Mixed‐effects models and content analyses of the feedback quantity (i.e., number of words) and quality (i.e., specificity, task alignment, and mode) revealed (1) larger quantity in self‐ than peer feedback, in suprasegmental than segmental feedback, and in those with higher English scores than their lower‐score counterparts; (2) comparable specificity and task alignment in self‐ and peer feedback but more positive comments in peer than self‐feedback, greater specificity and more modes in suprasegmental than segmental feedback, and greater specificity in feedback provided by higher‐score than lower‐score learners. These findings suggest L2 learners’ inadequate abilities in making judgments, which, together with engagement, is influenced by feedback type, pronunciation feature, and L2 proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70133
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Nuances: The Quantity and Quality of Learner Feedback in Second‐Language Pronunciation

Congchao Hua
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Understanding the Nuances: The Quantity and Quality of Learner Feedback in Second‐Language Pronunciation

Congchao Hua
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated the feedback behaviors of Chinese learners of English in second‐language (L2) pronunciation. Online written peer and self‐feedback guided by a feedback form were collected from 179 undergraduate‐level English learners over eight weeks. Mixed‐effects models and content analyses of the feedback quantity (i.e., number of words) and quality (i.e., specificity, task alignment, and mode) revealed (1) larger quantity in self‐ than peer feedback, in suprasegmental than segmental feedback, and in those with higher English scores than their lower‐score counterparts; (2) comparable specificity and task alignment in self‐ and peer feedback but more positive comments in peer than self‐feedback, greater specificity and more modes in suprasegmental than segmental feedback, and greater specificity in feedback provided by higher‐score than lower‐score learners. These findings suggest L2 learners’ inadequate abilities in making judgments, which, together with engagement, is influenced by feedback type, pronunciation feature, and L2 proficiency.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
City University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the Nuances: The Quantity and Quality of Learner Feedback in Second‐Language Pronunciation — Congchao Hua · International Journal of Applied Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS