Prostaglandins versus transcervical balloon for induction of labor for fetal growth restriction: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, open-label, superiority trial (PROBIN)

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The risk of labor induction-related cesarean delivery is estimated around 30%. Although comparative studies suggest a transcervical balloon catheter may reduce the incidence of uterine tachysystole and fetal heart rate abnormalities over prostaglandins (all indications combined), this remains insufficiently studied for FGR. The mechanical effects of the balloon catheter might reduce the incidence of uterine tachysystole, the frequency of nonreassuring fetal status and fetal distress during labor, and thus the cesarean risk in this high-risk population. This trial’s primary objective is to assess if transcervical balloon catheter compared with prostaglandins lowers the cesarean rate among women with FGR and induction of labor between 34+0 and 41+0 weeks’ gestation. PROBIN (PROstaglandins versus Balloon catheter for INduction of labor in fetal growth restriction) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in 16 French maternity units. Eligible participant will be women with FGR, defined as a fetus with an abdominal circumference and/or estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile, in cephalic presentation, between 34+0 and 41+0 weeks’ gestation; requiring induction of labor according to the practitioners and with a Bishop score < 6. They will be randomized to cervical ripening by either a transcervical balloon catheter or prostaglandins. Women aged < 18 years, with no health insurance, a previous cesarean, multiple pregnancy, or fetal congenital malformation will be excluded. Randomization will be stratified by center and parity. The primary outcome will be the cesarean delivery incidence, regardless of indication. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and maternal birth experience. Assuming an alpha-risk of 0.05 and beta-risk of 0.20 (statistical power of 80%), a total of 774 women (387 per arm) is required to demonstrate a relative reduction of at least 30% in the primary endpoint — from 30% (prostaglandin group) to 21% (transcervical balloon catheter group) — with a potential loss-to-follow-up rate of 5%. If the reduction in cesarean delivery rates is confirmed with labor induction by transcervical balloon catheter in pregnancies with FGR, this method should be considered over prostaglandins. The short- and long-term maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery makes reducing its incidence a major public health challenge. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05674487, registered April 27th, 2023. The first participant was recruited April 9th, 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08709-x
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prostaglandins versus transcervical balloon for induction of labor for fetal growth restriction: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, open-label, superiority trial (PROBIN)

L. Lassel, Vincent Dochez, Philippe Deruelle, C. Chauleur et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Prostaglandins versus transcervical balloon for induction of labor for fetal growth restriction: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, open-label, superiority trial (PROBIN)

L. Lassel, Vincent Dochez, Philippe Deruelle, C. Chauleur, Tristan Gauthier, Caroline Lacoste, C. Diguisto, Marie-Laure Legris, Lucie Sedille, Tiphaine Barjat, F. Coatleven, Alexandre Vivanti, Julie Blanc, Damien Subtil, Alizée Froeliger, C. Guérin, Clémence Houssin, Eric Verspyck, Cyril Huissoud, Marion Kret, Elie Azria, Hugo Madar, Christophe Vayssiere, Franck Perrotin, Muriel Doret, François Goffinet, Paul Berveiller, Norbert Winer, Camille Le Ray, Patrick Rozenberg, Aude Girault, Loïc Sentilhes, Nicolas Mottet, Amaury Brot, the PROBIN study group, Jeanne Sibiude, Charline Bertholdt, Raoul Desbrière, Caroline Bohec, Denis Gallot, Marie-Victoire Senat, Charles Garabédian, Hanane Bouchghoul, Olivier Morel, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Paul Guerby, Thomas Schmitz, Lola Loussert, Florence Bretelle, Antoine Bénard, Edouard Lecarpentier, Maëla Le Maëla, the Groupe de Recherche en Gynécologie Obstétrique (GROG), Anne Ego
article en

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The risk of labor induction-related cesarean delivery is estimated around 30%. Although comparative studies suggest a transcervical balloon catheter may reduce the incidence of uterine tachysystole and fetal heart rate abnormalities over prostaglandins (all indications combined), this remains insufficiently studied for FGR. The mechanical effects of the balloon catheter might reduce the incidence of uterine tachysystole, the frequency of nonreassuring fetal status and fetal distress during labor, and thus the cesarean risk in this high-risk population. This trial’s primary objective is to assess if transcervical balloon catheter compared with prostaglandins lowers the cesarean rate among women with FGR and induction of labor between 34+0 and 41+0 weeks’ gestation. PROBIN (PROstaglandins versus Balloon catheter for INduction of labor in fetal growth restriction) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in 16 French maternity units. Eligible participant will be women with FGR, defined as a fetus with an abdominal circumference and/or estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile, in cephalic presentation, between 34+0 and 41+0 weeks’ gestation; requiring induction of labor according to the practitioners and with a Bishop score < 6. They will be randomized to cervical ripening by either a transcervical balloon catheter or prostaglandins. Women aged < 18 years, with no health insurance, a previous cesarean, multiple pregnancy, or fetal congenital malformation will be excluded. Randomization will be stratified by center and parity. The primary outcome will be the cesarean delivery incidence, regardless of indication. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and maternal birth experience. Assuming an alpha-risk of 0.05 and beta-risk of 0.20 (statistical power of 80%), a total of 774 women (387 per arm) is required to demonstrate a relative reduction of at least 30% in the primary endpoint — from 30% (prostaglandin group) to 21% (transcervical balloon catheter group) — with a potential loss-to-follow-up rate of 5%. If the reduction in cesarean delivery rates is confirmed with labor induction by transcervical balloon catheter in pregnancies with FGR, this method should be considered over prostaglandins. The short- and long-term maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery makes reducing its incidence a major public health challenge. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05674487, registered April 27th, 2023. The first participant was recruited April 9th, 2024.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 26(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.