How much methane do coal seam gas ponds emit?

Abstract Ponds are often used to store significant volumes of water involved in coal seam gas (CSG) extraction, but methane emissions from these ponds in Australia are not well understood. One recent review demonstrated that key drivers of methane emissions can be derived from natural water bodies, however, natural water body emissions are poor analogues for CSG-related water body emissions. Along with identifying key drivers of methane emissions, studies of natural water bodies highlighted that substantial knowledge gaps exist in relation to CSG ponds. These gaps include understanding of microbial communities and physiochemistry (including temperature) in both sediment and water column as well as pond dimensions. The absence of such information makes it difficult to predict which CSG ponds are likely to emit methane and to develop control strategies to prevent such emissions. If such data are available from a small number of ponds, modelling approach will be essential to understand total emissions from all CSG ponds in Queensland, which will be useful to inform industry, regulatory and government on emissions accounting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae4322
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How much methane do coal seam gas ponds emit?

Richard Schinteie, Emma Crooke, David J. Midgley, Se Gong et al.
Environmental Research Communications
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

How much methane do coal seam gas ponds emit?

Richard Schinteie, Emma Crooke, David J. Midgley, Se Gong, Linda Stalker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ponds are often used to store significant volumes of water involved in coal seam gas (CSG) extraction, but methane emissions from these ponds in Australia are not well understood. One recent review demonstrated that key drivers of methane emissions can be derived from natural water bodies, however, natural water body emissions are poor analogues for CSG-related water body emissions. Along with identifying key drivers of methane emissions, studies of natural water bodies highlighted that substantial knowledge gaps exist in relation to CSG ponds. These gaps include understanding of microbial communities and physiochemistry (including temperature) in both sediment and water column as well as pond dimensions. The absence of such information makes it difficult to predict which CSG ponds are likely to emit methane and to develop control strategies to prevent such emissions. If such data are available from a small number of ponds, modelling approach will be essential to understand total emissions from all CSG ponds in Queensland, which will be useful to inform industry, regulatory and government on emissions accounting.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 8(2)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.