Navigating Chinese green deals through green investment, green technology, and green energy development: a race for sustainability or greenwashing?

Abstract Drawing from the recent COP28, which espouses a boom in clean energy transition through technological forwardness, and the framework of the SDG, we address critical questions related to green investment, energy investment, and environmental sustainability. We scrutinize whether green technology genuinely leads to green investment and energy investment in China and whether the causal nexus between these variables holds amid an EKC postulation. We use Chinese provincial data from 1998 to 2020 and deploy the quantile moment-based non-parametric regression technique and the newly developed Granger noncausality strategy. Our findings reveal that energy-related investment significantly improves green investment in China. Similarly, green investment increases energy-related investment. Our empirical findings reveal that green technology does not significantly enhance green investment across the sampled Chinese provinces, which may suggest inconsistencies between technological innovation and firms’ green investment behavior. This could be partially associated with potential greenwashing tendencies observed in some enterprises. This observation also indicates the presence of the greenwashing hypothesis for running enterprises in China. Moreover, financial development and industrial value addition foster both green investment and energy investment in China. Finally, energy and green investment do not support the inhibition of CO 2 emissions in China. However, green technology helps curb CO 2 emissions, which is valid when the EKC hypothesis holds. Overall, this study unravels the presence of the greenwashing hypothesis in China, urging policymakers and regulatory authorities to impose stringent environmental regulations so that enterprises abide by green policies. Our findings have implications for scrapping greenwashing and supporting the attainment of SDGs in China. The findings of this study have important implications in the context of sustainable development in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Innovation
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-025-00894-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
99.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Chinese green deals through green investment, green technology, and green energy development: a race for sustainability or greenwashing?

Rabeh Khalfaoui, Mohammad Razib Hossain, Sudeshna Ghosh, Buhari Doğan et al.
1 citations
Financial Innovation
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
99.81
article

Navigating Chinese green deals through green investment, green technology, and green energy development: a race for sustainability or greenwashing?

Rabeh Khalfaoui, Mohammad Razib Hossain, Sudeshna Ghosh, Buhari Doğan, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Drawing from the recent COP28, which espouses a boom in clean energy transition through technological forwardness, and the framework of the SDG, we address critical questions related to green investment, energy investment, and environmental sustainability. We scrutinize whether green technology genuinely leads to green investment and energy investment in China and whether the causal nexus between these variables holds amid an EKC postulation. We use Chinese provincial data from 1998 to 2020 and deploy the quantile moment-based non-parametric regression technique and the newly developed Granger noncausality strategy. Our findings reveal that energy-related investment significantly improves green investment in China. Similarly, green investment increases energy-related investment. Our empirical findings reveal that green technology does not significantly enhance green investment across the sampled Chinese provinces, which may suggest inconsistencies between technological innovation and firms’ green investment behavior. This could be partially associated with potential greenwashing tendencies observed in some enterprises. This observation also indicates the presence of the greenwashing hypothesis for running enterprises in China. Moreover, financial development and industrial value addition foster both green investment and energy investment in China. Finally, energy and green investment do not support the inhibition of CO 2 emissions in China. However, green technology helps curb CO 2 emissions, which is valid when the EKC hypothesis holds. Overall, this study unravels the presence of the greenwashing hypothesis in China, urging policymakers and regulatory authorities to impose stringent environmental regulations so that enterprises abide by green policies. Our findings have implications for scrapping greenwashing and supporting the attainment of SDGs in China. The findings of this study have important implications in the context of sustainable development in China.

Financial InnovationVol. 12(1)
University of Calcutta (IN), National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Applied Science Private University (JO), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR), King Saud University (SA), Western Caspian University (AZ), University of Business and Technology (SA), Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises, The University of Adelaide (AU), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BD), Université de Lorraine (FR)
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
99.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.