Considerations for Menstrual Suppression in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Patients who menstruate during treatment for hematologic malignancies have a higher risk of heavy vaginal bleeding due to thrombocytopenia caused by malignancy and myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Heavy menstrual bleeding is associated with significant morbidity in this patient population, and menstrual suppression is a standard of supportive care. Options for prophylactic menstrual suppression include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, progestin-only therapy, and combined hormonal contraception. Various factors impact the choice of menstrual suppression agent, including efficacy, presence of emergent acute uterine bleeding, desire for contraception, and presence of thrombotic risk factors. The purpose of this review is to discuss the nuances of available menstrual suppression agents in patients with hematologic malignancies and develop a methodical approach to consider patient-specific factors that impact agent selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70114
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for Menstrual Suppression in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Allison Schepers, Martina Fraga, Sahaana Veeravalli, Lydia L Benitez
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

Considerations for Menstrual Suppression in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Allison Schepers, Martina Fraga, Sahaana Veeravalli, Lydia L Benitez
article en

Abstract

Patients who menstruate during treatment for hematologic malignancies have a higher risk of heavy vaginal bleeding due to thrombocytopenia caused by malignancy and myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Heavy menstrual bleeding is associated with significant morbidity in this patient population, and menstrual suppression is a standard of supportive care. Options for prophylactic menstrual suppression include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, progestin-only therapy, and combined hormonal contraception. Various factors impact the choice of menstrual suppression agent, including efficacy, presence of emergent acute uterine bleeding, desire for contraception, and presence of thrombotic risk factors. The purpose of this review is to discuss the nuances of available menstrual suppression agents in patients with hematologic malignancies and develop a methodical approach to consider patient-specific factors that impact agent selection.

Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapyVol. 46(3)
University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considerations for Menstrual Suppression in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies — Allison Schepers, Martina Fraga, et al. · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS