Clinicians' Perspectives of the Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory ‘ <scp>PITA</scp> ’ Quick Guide: An Evaluation Across Three Australian Healthcare Settings

Pressure injuries present significant challenges in clinical care, leading to severe complications such as infection, pain and delayed wound healing. They are a common chronic wound that contribute to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays and substantial healthcare costs. Despite national efforts to enhance chronic wound management, development of optimal treatment strategies remains a priority. The Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory (PITA) Quick Guide was developed to provide an evidence-based guide to support clinicians in pressure injury management. A survey was conducted to evaluate clinician perspectives on the usability and practicality of the Guide in acute care, residential aged care and community settings. A post-test survey was conducted on a convenience sample of healthcare professionals from three healthcare settings across metropolitan, regional and rural Australia. The survey included 5-point Likert-scale items assessing ease of use, effectiveness and integration with workflows. Three hundred and two responses were received (66.7% response rate). Clinicians expressed overwhelmingly positive perceptions, with over 95% agreeing or strongly agreeing on the guide's utility and effectiveness. No respondents strongly disagreed with any item. Residential aged care and rural clinicians rated the tool slightly higher than acute care and medical clinicians. The PITA Quick Guide was well-received across all settings, demonstrating strong potential to enhance evidence-based pressure injury management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70811
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians' Perspectives of the Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory ‘ PITA ’ Quick Guide: An Evaluation Across Three Australian Healthcare Settings

Ann Marie Dunk, Catherine Leahy, Sarah Sage, John Stephenson et al.
International Wound Journal
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Clinicians' Perspectives of the Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory ‘ PITA ’ Quick Guide: An Evaluation Across Three Australian Healthcare Settings

Ann Marie Dunk, Catherine Leahy, Sarah Sage, John Stephenson, Hayley Ryan, Michelle Lai, Keryln Carville, Michelle Gibb, Kerrie Coleman, Fiona Coyer, Michelle Barakat‐Johnson, Melinda Brooks, Tabatha Rando, Wendy Palm
article en

Abstract

Pressure injuries present significant challenges in clinical care, leading to severe complications such as infection, pain and delayed wound healing. They are a common chronic wound that contribute to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays and substantial healthcare costs. Despite national efforts to enhance chronic wound management, development of optimal treatment strategies remains a priority. The Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory (PITA) Quick Guide was developed to provide an evidence-based guide to support clinicians in pressure injury management. A survey was conducted to evaluate clinician perspectives on the usability and practicality of the Guide in acute care, residential aged care and community settings. A post-test survey was conducted on a convenience sample of healthcare professionals from three healthcare settings across metropolitan, regional and rural Australia. The survey included 5-point Likert-scale items assessing ease of use, effectiveness and integration with workflows. Three hundred and two responses were received (66.7% response rate). Clinicians expressed overwhelmingly positive perceptions, with over 95% agreeing or strongly agreeing on the guide's utility and effectiveness. No respondents strongly disagreed with any item. Residential aged care and rural clinicians rated the tool slightly higher than acute care and medical clinicians. The PITA Quick Guide was well-received across all settings, demonstrating strong potential to enhance evidence-based pressure injury management.

International Wound JournalVol. 23(2)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), University of Huddersfield (GB), Charles Sturt University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Curtin University (AU), Australian College of Nursing (AU), Canberra Hospital (AU), World Islamic Sciences and Education University (JO), Western NSW Local Health District (AU), Primary HealthCare (MT), Resthaven Incorporated (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), Services Australia (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.