Good Recovery, Poor Participation? A Secondary Analysis of the Dissociation Between Global Disability and Real-Life Participation Five Years After Traumatic Brain Injury

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Global disability scales such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) may not fully capture real-life participation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This secondary analysis quantified mismatch between global disability and participation 5 years after moderate-to-severe TBI and identified predictors of a "good recovery, poor participation" profile. <b>Methods</b>: We analysed the TBIMS National Database Public Use Data Set, including adults ≥ 16 years with moderate-to-severe TBI, 5-year follow-up, and valid GOS-E, PART-O, and employment data. High versus low global outcome was defined as GOS-E 7-8 versus 3-6; good versus poor participation was defined using PART-O total (≥median vs. ≤25th percentile) plus productive role engagement. Four outcome profiles were derived and compared using 2 × 2 factorial analyses and regression. <b>Results</b>: The analytic cohort included 6363 participants; among those with high GOS-E, 16.8% met criteria for poor participation. Profiles with poor participation showed lower participation and lower life satisfaction and higher mood symptoms than Group A (high GOS-E, good participation), whereas those with low GOS-E but good participation showed preserved participation with greater emotional burden. Older age, lower education, minority race/ethnicity, pre-injury unemployment or retirement, longer post-traumatic amnesia, and lower 2-year GOS-E independently predicted mismatch. Sensitivity analyses using alternative GOS-E and participation cut-offs and life-satisfaction outcomes yielded similar patterns. <b>Conclusions</b>: Five years after moderate-to-severe TBI, good global recovery does not guarantee successful reintegration, and some individuals maintain participation despite persisting disability. Routine assessment of participation and life satisfaction alongside global disability is needed to identify high-risk profiles and target vocational and psychosocial interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14010075
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good Recovery, Poor Participation? A Secondary Analysis of the Dissociation Between Global Disability and Real-Life Participation Five Years After Traumatic Brain Injury

Tina Balletta, Rosaria De Luca, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Carmela Rifici et al.
Medical Sciences
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Good Recovery, Poor Participation? A Secondary Analysis of the Dissociation Between Global Disability and Real-Life Participation Five Years After Traumatic Brain Injury

Tina Balletta, Rosaria De Luca, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Carmela Rifici, Andrea Calderone, Lilla Bonanno
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Global disability scales such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) may not fully capture real-life participation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This secondary analysis quantified mismatch between global disability and participation 5 years after moderate-to-severe TBI and identified predictors of a "good recovery, poor participation" profile. <b>Methods</b>: We analysed the TBIMS National Database Public Use Data Set, including adults ≥ 16 years with moderate-to-severe TBI, 5-year follow-up, and valid GOS-E, PART-O, and employment data. High versus low global outcome was defined as GOS-E 7-8 versus 3-6; good versus poor participation was defined using PART-O total (≥median vs. ≤25th percentile) plus productive role engagement. Four outcome profiles were derived and compared using 2 × 2 factorial analyses and regression. <b>Results</b>: The analytic cohort included 6363 participants; among those with high GOS-E, 16.8% met criteria for poor participation. Profiles with poor participation showed lower participation and lower life satisfaction and higher mood symptoms than Group A (high GOS-E, good participation), whereas those with low GOS-E but good participation showed preserved participation with greater emotional burden. Older age, lower education, minority race/ethnicity, pre-injury unemployment or retirement, longer post-traumatic amnesia, and lower 2-year GOS-E independently predicted mismatch. Sensitivity analyses using alternative GOS-E and participation cut-offs and life-satisfaction outcomes yielded similar patterns. <b>Conclusions</b>: Five years after moderate-to-severe TBI, good global recovery does not guarantee successful reintegration, and some individuals maintain participation despite persisting disability. Routine assessment of participation and life satisfaction alongside global disability is needed to identify high-risk profiles and target vocational and psychosocial interventions.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(1)
San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino" (IT), Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (IT)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, North Dakota Soybean Council, Ministero della Salute, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.