Remote audiogram and notched-noise tests using Gaussian processes

The study aimed to develop and validate remote hearing detection (audiogram) and discrimination (notched-noise) tests, which used Bayesian active-learning based Gaussian processes, as a binary discriminator between audible and inaudible sounds, and to choose the stimulus parameters. Forty-two participants (aged 48-75 years) performed the two tests remotely using their own equipment. The participants were recruited with pure-tone audiometry known a priori. The agreements between the true and estimated hearing thresholds were assessed using Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). The notched-noise test was used to derive auditory filter shape parameters, from which equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) were estimated. The ERBs were correlated with participants' hearing thresholds and compared to published data. The agreement between the true and estimated hearing thresholds ranged between poor and fair (CCC = 0.19 and 0.34), with an average bias (±limit of agreements) of 27.3 (±17.8) dB. This was attributed to the lack of calibration of the participants' equipment. The estimated ERBs followed the trend of published data and were significantly correlated with pure-tone audiometry at 1000 Hz (rs = 0.36). Our findings indicate that the remote detection and discrimination tests can collectively track the breakpoints, slopes of thresholds, and the width of auditory filters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0042400
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote audiogram and notched-noise tests using Gaussian processes

Josef Schlittenlacher, Michael A. Stone, Emanuele Perugia, Karolina Kluk
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Remote audiogram and notched-noise tests using Gaussian processes

Josef Schlittenlacher, Michael A. Stone, Emanuele Perugia, Karolina Kluk
article en

Abstract

The study aimed to develop and validate remote hearing detection (audiogram) and discrimination (notched-noise) tests, which used Bayesian active-learning based Gaussian processes, as a binary discriminator between audible and inaudible sounds, and to choose the stimulus parameters. Forty-two participants (aged 48-75 years) performed the two tests remotely using their own equipment. The participants were recruited with pure-tone audiometry known a priori. The agreements between the true and estimated hearing thresholds were assessed using Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). The notched-noise test was used to derive auditory filter shape parameters, from which equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) were estimated. The ERBs were correlated with participants' hearing thresholds and compared to published data. The agreement between the true and estimated hearing thresholds ranged between poor and fair (CCC = 0.19 and 0.34), with an average bias (±limit of agreements) of 27.3 (±17.8) dB. This was attributed to the lack of calibration of the participants' equipment. The estimated ERBs followed the trend of published data and were significantly correlated with pure-tone audiometry at 1000 Hz (rs = 0.36). Our findings indicate that the remote detection and discrimination tests can collectively track the breakpoints, slopes of thresholds, and the width of auditory filters.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 159(2)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.