Uncovering algorithmic inequity: a conditional mutual information framework for detecting and mitigating hidden discrimination

Abstract Machine learning (ML) systems are increasingly embedded in automated decision-making processes across sectors such as healthcare, employment, and education. Traditional fairness metrics are typically used to assess equality across broad demographic categories but cannot capture nuanced and intersectional patterns of discrimination. Thus, this paper introduces a novel methodological framework that combines multialgorithm clustering with conditional mutual information (CMI) to detect hidden subgroup-level discrimination in ML systems. By analysing real-world datasets, we uncover statistically significant discriminatory patterns that disproportionately affect multiple marginalized individuals, particularly at the intersection of protected attributes. Additionally, we evaluate mitigation strategies, such as fairness-aware representation learning, that reduce bias while maintaining predictive accuracy. The findings have two major implications: (1) they highlight the inadequacy of surface-level fairness checks in complex sociotechnical systems, and (2) they offer actionable tools and insights for developers, managers, and policymakers seeking to audit and regulate ML technologies responsibly. Our study contributes to a growing body of work on the societal impact of algorithmic technologies and advances the methodological toolkit for equitable technology governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00972-6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering algorithmic inequity: a conditional mutual information framework for detecting and mitigating hidden discrimination

John Marko, Ciprian Daniel Neagu, P. B. Anand
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Uncovering algorithmic inequity: a conditional mutual information framework for detecting and mitigating hidden discrimination

John Marko, Ciprian Daniel Neagu, P. B. Anand
article en

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) systems are increasingly embedded in automated decision-making processes across sectors such as healthcare, employment, and education. Traditional fairness metrics are typically used to assess equality across broad demographic categories but cannot capture nuanced and intersectional patterns of discrimination. Thus, this paper introduces a novel methodological framework that combines multialgorithm clustering with conditional mutual information (CMI) to detect hidden subgroup-level discrimination in ML systems. By analysing real-world datasets, we uncover statistically significant discriminatory patterns that disproportionately affect multiple marginalized individuals, particularly at the intersection of protected attributes. Additionally, we evaluate mitigation strategies, such as fairness-aware representation learning, that reduce bias while maintaining predictive accuracy. The findings have two major implications: (1) they highlight the inadequacy of surface-level fairness checks in complex sociotechnical systems, and (2) they offer actionable tools and insights for developers, managers, and policymakers seeking to audit and regulate ML technologies responsibly. Our study contributes to a growing body of work on the societal impact of algorithmic technologies and advances the methodological toolkit for equitable technology governance.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
University of Bradford (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncovering algorithmic inequity: a conditional mutual information framework for detecting and mitigating hidden discrimination — John Marko, Ciprian Daniel Neagu, et al. · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS