Feasibility Analysis of Decentralized Pressure Improvement in Peripheral Water Networks: Case Study of Zone 3, Surabaya, Indonesia

The study evaluates shifting Surabaya’s low-pressure coastal area (Zone 3) from a centralized to a decentralized water treatment system. Current residual pressure is below 2 mH2O, failing the 5–10 mH2O standard, and Scenario 1 shows the existing system cannot meet 2030 demand. Scenario 2, following the utility’s centralized expansion (Karang Pilang IV WTP, Putat Gede 3 Booster Pump, Mbah Ratu Reservoir), reaches 88% of customers at adequate pressure by 2030 but requires IDR 219.98 billion. A decentralized alternative with a local 500 L/s WTP and 900 m3 reservoir dedicated to Zone 3 achieves 98% coverage at the required pressure for only IDR 100.5 billion. The study concludes that decentralized systems can more effectively and cost‑efficiently boost pressure and meet growing demand where raw water sources are limited and centralized expansion is insufficient.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202621606004/pdf
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility Analysis of Decentralized Pressure Improvement in Peripheral Water Networks: Case Study of Zone 3, Surabaya, Indonesia

U Lasminto, Hendro Ardiansyah Riyanto, Qoyyum Imaniar
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Feasibility Analysis of Decentralized Pressure Improvement in Peripheral Water Networks: Case Study of Zone 3, Surabaya, Indonesia

U Lasminto, Hendro Ardiansyah Riyanto, Qoyyum Imaniar
article en

Abstract

The study evaluates shifting Surabaya’s low-pressure coastal area (Zone 3) from a centralized to a decentralized water treatment system. Current residual pressure is below 2 mH2O, failing the 5–10 mH2O standard, and Scenario 1 shows the existing system cannot meet 2030 demand. Scenario 2, following the utility’s centralized expansion (Karang Pilang IV WTP, Putat Gede 3 Booster Pump, Mbah Ratu Reservoir), reaches 88% of customers at adequate pressure by 2030 but requires IDR 219.98 billion. A decentralized alternative with a local 500 L/s WTP and 900 m3 reservoir dedicated to Zone 3 achieves 98% coverage at the required pressure for only IDR 100.5 billion. The study concludes that decentralized systems can more effectively and cost‑efficiently boost pressure and meet growing demand where raw water sources are limited and centralized expansion is insufficient.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.