Scoping review of outcomes reported in studies with older adults in the Emergency Department

Abstract Background The number of older adult Emergency Department (ED) attendances is rising in line with population ageing. These ED visits are associated with adverse outcomes. Consequently, intervention studies with older adults in the ED aiming to mitigate adverse outcomes are increasing. However, there is currently no agreement on what outcomes to measure in these studies. This outcome heterogeneity has negative implications for synthesising evidence and for policy implications. To address this issue, we plan to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in studies with older adults in the ED setting. The first step in this process is to generate a long list of potential outcomes to include in the COS via a scoping review. Methods A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and reported with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). An international trial register and 3 electronic databases were searched to locate experimental studies that recruited a population of older adults (aged 65yrs+) or in the ED. Searches and screening were completed independently by two researchers. Data was extracted using a custom data extraction template, the study design, outcomes measured, outcome tools, and measurement timepoints were recorded. Results Over 23,000 papers were screened with a full text review of 363 papers and a final inclusion of 106 papers. Outcomes were split into primary and secondary with a total of 217 in total reported across included studies (93 primary and 124 secondary outcomes). The modified Dodd taxonomy for Core Outcome Sets was utilised with 38 outcome domains used to categorise the outcomes reported. Conclusion This scoping review has highlighted the large variety of outcomes. Mapping these outcomes will inform the development of a Core Outcome Set which will have the potential to enhance future trials with this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.029
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoping review of outcomes reported in studies with older adults in the Emergency Department

Kara Mc Loughlin, Katie Robinson
Age and Ageing
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Scoping review of outcomes reported in studies with older adults in the Emergency Department

Kara Mc Loughlin, Katie Robinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The number of older adult Emergency Department (ED) attendances is rising in line with population ageing. These ED visits are associated with adverse outcomes. Consequently, intervention studies with older adults in the ED aiming to mitigate adverse outcomes are increasing. However, there is currently no agreement on what outcomes to measure in these studies. This outcome heterogeneity has negative implications for synthesising evidence and for policy implications. To address this issue, we plan to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in studies with older adults in the ED setting. The first step in this process is to generate a long list of potential outcomes to include in the COS via a scoping review. Methods A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and reported with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). An international trial register and 3 electronic databases were searched to locate experimental studies that recruited a population of older adults (aged 65yrs+) or in the ED. Searches and screening were completed independently by two researchers. Data was extracted using a custom data extraction template, the study design, outcomes measured, outcome tools, and measurement timepoints were recorded. Results Over 23,000 papers were screened with a full text review of 363 papers and a final inclusion of 106 papers. Outcomes were split into primary and secondary with a total of 217 in total reported across included studies (93 primary and 124 secondary outcomes). The modified Dodd taxonomy for Core Outcome Sets was utilised with 38 outcome domains used to categorise the outcomes reported. Conclusion This scoping review has highlighted the large variety of outcomes. Mapping these outcomes will inform the development of a Core Outcome Set which will have the potential to enhance future trials with this population.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
University of Limerick (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.