Simulation of the refuelling process for an LH2-Powered commercial Aircraft: Part 2 - Refuelling time of the Airbus ZEROe turboprop concept

Liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) is gaining momentum as a sustainable aviation fuel, but its cryogenic nature poses significant challenges for ground operations, particularly aircraft refuelling. This process is increasingly recognised as a potential bottleneck for operational efficiency, as it can significantly extend turnaround times. Although some recent studies have proposed assumptions about LH 2 refuelling rates, their conclusions vary widely, and detailed modelling efforts remain limited. This paper presents the second part of a two-part study that aims to improve understanding of the LH 2 refuelling by delivering a validated numerical modelling framework and practical insights to support the design of future LH 2 -powered aircraft and their airport refuelling operations. Part 1 focused on developing and validating a thermodynamic model that captures key physical phenomena such as heat transfer and droplet dynamics. The model was validated against experimental data from the LH 2 no-vent filling tests to demonstrate its accuracy in predicting relevant physical processes. In Part 2, the validated model is applied to a representative case study based on the Airbus ZEROe Turboprop concept. The objective is to quantify the refuelling time and hydrogen venting under realistic conditions. The simulation results indicate a refuelling time of approximately 19 , min and ventilation losses of 36.7 , kg, corresponding to approximately 2. 2 % of the total transferred LH 2 mass. Although the duration of refuelling exceeds that of current kerosene-powered aircraft such as the Bombardier Q400, the overall turnaround time remains feasible if the LH 2 refuelling process is carried out in parallel with other ground operations, subject to safety protocols. These findings challenge simplified assumptions in the previous literature and provide physics-based insight to support the design of safe and efficient LH 2 fuelling procedures and infrastructure for future zero-emission aviation. • A validated mathematical model is used to simulate the cryogenic refuelling process. • Refuelling time for Zero-E turboprop aircraft is around 19min, significantly longer than an equivalent kerosene aircraft. • The increased refuelling time might penalize aircraft turnaround time, however not significantly. • The venting loss of hydrogen during refuelling is estimated around 2.2 % of the total fuel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153582
Primary Topic
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation of the refuelling process for an LH2-Powered commercial Aircraft: Part 2 - Refuelling time of the Airbus ZEROe turboprop concept

A. Gangoli Rao, M. van Put, L. ten Damme
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
article

Simulation of the refuelling process for an LH2-Powered commercial Aircraft: Part 2 - Refuelling time of the Airbus ZEROe turboprop concept

A. Gangoli Rao, M. van Put, L. ten Damme
article en

Abstract

Liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) is gaining momentum as a sustainable aviation fuel, but its cryogenic nature poses significant challenges for ground operations, particularly aircraft refuelling. This process is increasingly recognised as a potential bottleneck for operational efficiency, as it can significantly extend turnaround times. Although some recent studies have proposed assumptions about LH 2 refuelling rates, their conclusions vary widely, and detailed modelling efforts remain limited. This paper presents the second part of a two-part study that aims to improve understanding of the LH 2 refuelling by delivering a validated numerical modelling framework and practical insights to support the design of future LH 2 -powered aircraft and their airport refuelling operations. Part 1 focused on developing and validating a thermodynamic model that captures key physical phenomena such as heat transfer and droplet dynamics. The model was validated against experimental data from the LH 2 no-vent filling tests to demonstrate its accuracy in predicting relevant physical processes. In Part 2, the validated model is applied to a representative case study based on the Airbus ZEROe Turboprop concept. The objective is to quantify the refuelling time and hydrogen venting under realistic conditions. The simulation results indicate a refuelling time of approximately 19 , min and ventilation losses of 36.7 , kg, corresponding to approximately 2. 2 % of the total transferred LH 2 mass. Although the duration of refuelling exceeds that of current kerosene-powered aircraft such as the Bombardier Q400, the overall turnaround time remains feasible if the LH 2 refuelling process is carried out in parallel with other ground operations, subject to safety protocols. These findings challenge simplified assumptions in the previous literature and provide physics-based insight to support the design of safe and efficient LH 2 fuelling procedures and infrastructure for future zero-emission aviation. • A validated mathematical model is used to simulate the cryogenic refuelling process. • Refuelling time for Zero-E turboprop aircraft is around 19min, significantly longer than an equivalent kerosene aircraft. • The increased refuelling time might penalize aircraft turnaround time, however not significantly. • The venting loss of hydrogen during refuelling is estimated around 2.2 % of the total fuel.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 216
Airbus (Netherlands) (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.