NeuroSymbolic Knowledge-Grounded Planning and Reasoning in AI Systems

To build AI systems capable of decision-support assistance, such as AI-assisted healthcare, it is essential to develop user-centric decision-making processes that are robust, interpretable, and capable of effectively processing and acting on natural language interactions. Instruction-based prompting of large language models has demonstrated considerable success in supporting humans with information assistance tasks, including creative writing and content generation. However, recent studies reveal that language models exhibit limitations in performing complex reasoning and planning tasks, such as constructing compositional or hierarchical plans involving multiple reasoning steps. To address these challenges, we propose a neurosymbolic framework that integrates large language models with symbolic knowledge graphs, graph-based reasoners, and constraint-aware planning modules. This hybrid approach leverages the open-ended generative capabilities of language models—for instance, generating initial plans—while incorporating domain-specific structured representations through knowledge graphs to manage and refine these plans. The integration facilitates scalable and robust planning and reasoning in complex domains while adhering to domain-specific constraints. Through an example in the healthcare context, we explain how this framework offers the potential to enforce safety standards, ensure compliance with domain-specific regulations, and maintain logical consistency throughout extended decision-making processes. We further show the utility of this approach with examples drawn from complex decision-making environments in other domains (e.g., manufacturing), emphasizing its relevance and broader applicability in scenarios where trustworthy, safety-constrained planning and reasoning are critical.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2025.3544943">https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2025.3544943</a></p
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NeuroSymbolic Knowledge-Grounded Planning and Reasoning in AI Systems

Vishal Pallagani, Megha Chakraborty, Vedant Khandelwal, Kaushik Roy et al.
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
article

NeuroSymbolic Knowledge-Grounded Planning and Reasoning in AI Systems

Vishal Pallagani, Megha Chakraborty, Vedant Khandelwal, Kaushik Roy, Amit Sheth
article en

Abstract

To build AI systems capable of decision-support assistance, such as AI-assisted healthcare, it is essential to develop user-centric decision-making processes that are robust, interpretable, and capable of effectively processing and acting on natural language interactions. Instruction-based prompting of large language models has demonstrated considerable success in supporting humans with information assistance tasks, including creative writing and content generation. However, recent studies reveal that language models exhibit limitations in performing complex reasoning and planning tasks, such as constructing compositional or hierarchical plans involving multiple reasoning steps. To address these challenges, we propose a neurosymbolic framework that integrates large language models with symbolic knowledge graphs, graph-based reasoners, and constraint-aware planning modules. This hybrid approach leverages the open-ended generative capabilities of language models—for instance, generating initial plans—while incorporating domain-specific structured representations through knowledge graphs to manage and refine these plans. The integration facilitates scalable and robust planning and reasoning in complex domains while adhering to domain-specific constraints. Through an example in the healthcare context, we explain how this framework offers the potential to enforce safety standards, ensure compliance with domain-specific regulations, and maintain logical consistency throughout extended decision-making processes. We further show the utility of this approach with examples drawn from complex decision-making environments in other domains (e.g., manufacturing), emphasizing its relevance and broader applicability in scenarios where trustworthy, safety-constrained planning and reasoning are critical.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NeuroSymbolic Knowledge-Grounded Planning and Reasoning in AI Systems — Vishal Pallagani, Megha Chakraborty, et al. · Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS