Intergenerational Equity in International Climate Law as a Legal Criterion for the Interpretation of State Climate Obligations According to the ICJ

This article examines in detail Advisory Opinion No. 32, issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in July 2025. The analysis examines how the decision of the International Court of Justice establishes the principle of intergenerational equity as an interpretative criterion for climate obligations, consolidating specific duties of prevention, due diligence, cooperation, mitigation, and adaptation to the consequences of climate change that directly affect present and future generations. This Opinion also designates the 1.5 °C threshold as a central legal benchmark for assessing States’ due diligence in climate mitigation and adaptation and extends state obligations to the regulation of private actors, characterizing climate protection as an erga omnes duty based on human rights and customary international law. Through a doctrinal and institutional legal method, supported by systematic documentary analysis of treaties, case law and soft-law instruments, this study situates the ICJ’s reasoning within the broader evolution of intergenerational equity and explores its implications for state responsibility and climate litigation. It also analyzes the potential of the Advisory Opinion to foster new institutional mechanisms, such as ombudsmen, fiduciary management mechanisms, and intergenerational impact assessments, to represent future generations in climate governance. The main conclusion is that the Advisory Opinion inaugurates a new stage in global climate governance, in which intergenerational equity ceases to be a purely aspirational vision and instead operates as a binding interpretative standard guiding the interpretation and review of existing climate obligations, rather than serving as an autonomous source of new duties. However, its transformative effect will depend primarily on the political will and institutional capacity of states to implement effective mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15010010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
99.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intergenerational Equity in International Climate Law as a Legal Criterion for the Interpretation of State Climate Obligations According to the ICJ

Eliana Díaz-Cruces, Simone Belli, Camilo Zamora-Ledezma
1 citations
Laws
Environmental law and policy
99.38
article

Intergenerational Equity in International Climate Law as a Legal Criterion for the Interpretation of State Climate Obligations According to the ICJ

Eliana Díaz-Cruces, Simone Belli, Camilo Zamora-Ledezma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines in detail Advisory Opinion No. 32, issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in July 2025. The analysis examines how the decision of the International Court of Justice establishes the principle of intergenerational equity as an interpretative criterion for climate obligations, consolidating specific duties of prevention, due diligence, cooperation, mitigation, and adaptation to the consequences of climate change that directly affect present and future generations. This Opinion also designates the 1.5 °C threshold as a central legal benchmark for assessing States’ due diligence in climate mitigation and adaptation and extends state obligations to the regulation of private actors, characterizing climate protection as an erga omnes duty based on human rights and customary international law. Through a doctrinal and institutional legal method, supported by systematic documentary analysis of treaties, case law and soft-law instruments, this study situates the ICJ’s reasoning within the broader evolution of intergenerational equity and explores its implications for state responsibility and climate litigation. It also analyzes the potential of the Advisory Opinion to foster new institutional mechanisms, such as ombudsmen, fiduciary management mechanisms, and intergenerational impact assessments, to represent future generations in climate governance. The main conclusion is that the Advisory Opinion inaugurates a new stage in global climate governance, in which intergenerational equity ceases to be a purely aspirational vision and instead operates as a binding interpretative standard guiding the interpretation and review of existing climate obligations, rather than serving as an autonomous source of new duties. However, its transformative effect will depend primarily on the political will and institutional capacity of states to implement effective mechanisms.

LawsVol. 15(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (ES), Universidad Ecotec (EC), Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental law and policy
99.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.