Driving security? U.S. auto industrial policy in a changing world

Abstract Industrial policy is in increasing use in both the U.S. and other countries. The auto industry, however, has benefited from industrial policy even during decades when it was out of favor, from NAFTA to the 2009 auto bailouts, IRA’s EV tax credits, and now auto tariffs. If industrial policy should be applied only very selectively, should the auto industry be an industrial policy target today? Now is a dynamic time in the global auto industry. The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is upending a long-stable competitive landscape. China’s indigenous EV automakers have become major producers and exporters in a handful of years. The Chinese government is pervasively involved in its EV industry, while having developed a national monopoly position in global EV supply chains. Adding to security considerations, domestic auto manufacturing offers contingent defense manufacturing capability, while the computerization of vehicles raises new surveillance and cyberattack risks. This article examines today’s U.S. auto industrial policy in international and technological context, reviews the short track record of Biden EV policies, discusses how we should evaluate Trump’s auto industrial policy, and closes with recommendations for where industrial policy would be best focused to support the U.S. auto sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Economics
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-025-00442-1
Primary Topic
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving security? U.S. auto industrial policy in a changing world

Elaine Buckberg
Business Economics
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
article

Driving security? U.S. auto industrial policy in a changing world

Elaine Buckberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Industrial policy is in increasing use in both the U.S. and other countries. The auto industry, however, has benefited from industrial policy even during decades when it was out of favor, from NAFTA to the 2009 auto bailouts, IRA’s EV tax credits, and now auto tariffs. If industrial policy should be applied only very selectively, should the auto industry be an industrial policy target today? Now is a dynamic time in the global auto industry. The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is upending a long-stable competitive landscape. China’s indigenous EV automakers have become major producers and exporters in a handful of years. The Chinese government is pervasively involved in its EV industry, while having developed a national monopoly position in global EV supply chains. Adding to security considerations, domestic auto manufacturing offers contingent defense manufacturing capability, while the computerization of vehicles raises new surveillance and cyberattack risks. This article examines today’s U.S. auto industrial policy in international and technological context, reviews the short track record of Biden EV policies, discusses how we should evaluate Trump’s auto industrial policy, and closes with recommendations for where industrial policy would be best focused to support the U.S. auto sector.

Business Economics
Institute for Sustainability (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Driving security? U.S. auto industrial policy in a changing world — Elaine Buckberg · Business Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS