Attack Strategies and Robustness Certification in Decentralized FMTL Systems

Today, Federated Learning (FL) and Multi-Task Learning (MTL) have been extensively studied in both centralized and decentralized paradigms, but limited attention has been paid to the security vulnerabilities of decentralized FederatedMulti-Task Learning (DFMTL) systems, particularly under malicious client behavior. Specifically, most prior work has focused on developing increasingly efficient or innovative frameworks, and the field still lacks dedicated threat models and empirical robustness evaluations tailored to such systems. To address this gap, this thesis evaluates the robustness of the decentralized Federated Multi-Task Learning (DFMTL) framework. It then designs and implements seven distinct poisoning attack strategies within the DFMTL setting: three data poisoning attacks (Random Label Flip, Targeted Label Flipping, Trigger Injection), three model poisoning attacks (Sign Flip, Scaled Boost, AT2FL), and one backdoor-style aggregation attack (Malicious Aggregation Filter). All attacks are implemented individually within the DFMTL framework and adapted to operate on both federated settings with class-label heterogeneity (CIFAR-10) and task heterogeneity (CelebA: multi-label classification vs. facial landmark regression). Importantly, certain attacks, such as AT2FL and the Malicious Aggregation Filter, required dedicated design and implementation to function within the internal communication and optimization mechanisms of the DFMTL framework. In the experiments, a subset of clients are attacked. The evaluation analyzes both the performance degradation on the attacked clients and the collateral impact on unselected clients within the same task group and across di↵erent task groups. The findings reveal that despite the distributed and task-isolated nature of DFMTL, some poisoning attacks on selected clients can propagate across the system via shared aggregation pathways, while others remain localized. The results provide insight into which attack strategies pose the greatest risk. This work presents a robustness evaluation of a DFMTL system and provides a foundation for future defenses targeting DFMTL architectures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291153
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attack Strategies and Robustness Certification in Decentralized FMTL Systems

Zhi Wang
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Attack Strategies and Robustness Certification in Decentralized FMTL Systems

Zhi Wang
article en

Abstract

Today, Federated Learning (FL) and Multi-Task Learning (MTL) have been extensively studied in both centralized and decentralized paradigms, but limited attention has been paid to the security vulnerabilities of decentralized FederatedMulti-Task Learning (DFMTL) systems, particularly under malicious client behavior. Specifically, most prior work has focused on developing increasingly efficient or innovative frameworks, and the field still lacks dedicated threat models and empirical robustness evaluations tailored to such systems. To address this gap, this thesis evaluates the robustness of the decentralized Federated Multi-Task Learning (DFMTL) framework. It then designs and implements seven distinct poisoning attack strategies within the DFMTL setting: three data poisoning attacks (Random Label Flip, Targeted Label Flipping, Trigger Injection), three model poisoning attacks (Sign Flip, Scaled Boost, AT2FL), and one backdoor-style aggregation attack (Malicious Aggregation Filter). All attacks are implemented individually within the DFMTL framework and adapted to operate on both federated settings with class-label heterogeneity (CIFAR-10) and task heterogeneity (CelebA: multi-label classification vs. facial landmark regression). Importantly, certain attacks, such as AT2FL and the Malicious Aggregation Filter, required dedicated design and implementation to function within the internal communication and optimization mechanisms of the DFMTL framework. In the experiments, a subset of clients are attacked. The evaluation analyzes both the performance degradation on the attacked clients and the collateral impact on unselected clients within the same task group and across di↵erent task groups. The findings reveal that despite the distributed and task-isolated nature of DFMTL, some poisoning attacks on selected clients can propagate across the system via shared aggregation pathways, while others remain localized. The results provide insight into which attack strategies pose the greatest risk. This work presents a robustness evaluation of a DFMTL system and provides a foundation for future defenses targeting DFMTL architectures.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.