Accuracy and agreement of three blood-loss estimation methods versus the HbMass method for assessing blood loss during PLIF
Among routine methods, the Gross formula method offers the smallest bias and narrowest agreement limits versus HbMass, whereas visual estimation is clinically unreliable. PLIF-enhanced recovery pathways should replace sole reliance on visual assessment with the Gross formula method, supplemented by HbMass in high-risk cases, to optimize peri-operative volume therapy and reduce transfusion-related complications.
Authors
- Ningkui Niu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-6450)
- Bo Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-4861)
- Jian Hui Liu
- Qianpeng Ma
- Xingyu Duan
Institutions
- Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital (JP)
- Ningxia Medical University (CN)
- Ningxia Medical University General Hospital (CN)
- First People's Hospital of Chongqing (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Published
- 2026-02-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06709-3
- Primary Topic
- Blood transfusion and management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00