“I had to figure this out for myself.” Patients and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on rehabilitation uptake after treatment for head, neck and lung cancer: a qualitative interview study

<i>Background.</i> Rehabilitation is known to have many positive effects for cancer patients. However, patients with head, neck and lung cancer generally have a low uptake of rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore patient and healthcare professionals' perspectives on rehabilitation uptake after treatment for head, neck and lung cancer in a municipal setting. <i>Methods.</i> Semi-structured formal interviews were conducted with patients and healthcare professionals across hospital and rehabilitation settings in northern Denmark. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic content analysis. <i>Results.</i> There are multiple factors underlying the low uptake of rehabilitation for head, neck and lung cancer patients, ranging from systemic barriers, to matters of health (i)literacy and a perceived lack of interest, which upon further reflection often masks a deeper existential and/or physical vulnerability. <i>Discussion.</i> Our findings indicate that while many of the barriers to rehabilitation uptake arise in the transitions between care sectors, there is also a need to rethink how rehabilitation fits into the cancer care trajectory at hospital level. Current praxis leaves many opportunities for inequalities in rehabilitation access and uptake to arise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2626481
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I had to figure this out for myself.” Patients and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on rehabilitation uptake after treatment for head, neck and lung cancer: a qualitative interview study

Sophie Navntoft, Jane Andreasen, Kirsten Schultz Petersen, Lone Jørgensen et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Cancer survivorship and care
article

“I had to figure this out for myself.” Patients and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on rehabilitation uptake after treatment for head, neck and lung cancer: a qualitative interview study

Sophie Navntoft, Jane Andreasen, Kirsten Schultz Petersen, Lone Jørgensen, Emma Jelstrup Balkin
article en

Abstract

<i>Background.</i> Rehabilitation is known to have many positive effects for cancer patients. However, patients with head, neck and lung cancer generally have a low uptake of rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore patient and healthcare professionals' perspectives on rehabilitation uptake after treatment for head, neck and lung cancer in a municipal setting. <i>Methods.</i> Semi-structured formal interviews were conducted with patients and healthcare professionals across hospital and rehabilitation settings in northern Denmark. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic content analysis. <i>Results.</i> There are multiple factors underlying the low uptake of rehabilitation for head, neck and lung cancer patients, ranging from systemic barriers, to matters of health (i)literacy and a perceived lack of interest, which upon further reflection often masks a deeper existential and/or physical vulnerability. <i>Discussion.</i> Our findings indicate that while many of the barriers to rehabilitation uptake arise in the transitions between care sectors, there is also a need to rethink how rehabilitation fits into the cancer care trajectory at hospital level. Current praxis leaves many opportunities for inequalities in rehabilitation access and uptake to arise.

Disability and Rehabilitation
Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.