Are Galactic Clusters Hypermassive Spherically Symmetric Black Holes?

The possibility of estimating the parameters of alternative gravity theories from observations of galactic cluster “turnaround points” has been discussed in a recent publication. It was assumed that the gravitational field of a galactic cluster in the standard version of general relativity is described by the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric. The authors of this paper asserted that they had obtained estimates of the parameters of alternative gravity theories from observations of galactic clusters, but no comparison of the theory with observations was made in the paper, and the authors assumed that the theoretical description of turning points in GR and the alternative theories under consideration should be similar. In this study, we conclude that theoretical models such as static spherical black holes can hardly be used to obtain constraints on the parameters of alternative gravity theories by analyzing the differences in the turning radii in these theories and GR, based on observations of galactic clusters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1547477125701973
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Galactic Clusters Hypermassive Spherically Symmetric Black Holes?

A. F. Zakharov
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Are Galactic Clusters Hypermassive Spherically Symmetric Black Holes?

A. F. Zakharov
article en

Abstract

The possibility of estimating the parameters of alternative gravity theories from observations of galactic cluster “turnaround points” has been discussed in a recent publication. It was assumed that the gravitational field of a galactic cluster in the standard version of general relativity is described by the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric. The authors of this paper asserted that they had obtained estimates of the parameters of alternative gravity theories from observations of galactic clusters, but no comparison of the theory with observations was made in the paper, and the authors assumed that the theoretical description of turning points in GR and the alternative theories under consideration should be similar. In this study, we conclude that theoretical models such as static spherical black holes can hardly be used to obtain constraints on the parameters of alternative gravity theories by analyzing the differences in the turning radii in these theories and GR, based on observations of galactic clusters.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei LettersVol. 23(1)
Kurchatov Institute (RU), Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.