“If It Don’t Talk, It's Not Whakapapa Data”: Conceptualising Whakapapa Data in a Digital Age

In Te Ao Māori, whakapapa is a sacred framework that connects all aspects of existence. Whakapapa is highly sensitive information and a taonga that requires active protection. But what can be considered whakapapa data in a digital age where data linkage is ubiquitous and the boundaries between personal and collective information are increasingly blurred? We explore this question through a case study with Ngāti Tiipa, a hapū that is actively engaged in its own data sovereignty research. Reflexive thematic analysis of whānau kōrero identified three types of whakapapa data, each denoting a specific kind of connection: 1) between relatives, both living and deceased; 2) between people and places of cultural significance; and 3) between people and the spiritual realm. Whānau concepts of whakapapa data tend to be context-specific, suggesting that it is more useful to think of whakapapa data as dynamic and relational rather than a fixed, inherent attribute.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/snz2.70016
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“If It Don’t Talk, It's Not Whakapapa Data”: Conceptualising Whakapapa Data in a Digital Age

Tahu Kukutai, Ella Pēpi Tarapa‐Dewes
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

“If It Don’t Talk, It's Not Whakapapa Data”: Conceptualising Whakapapa Data in a Digital Age

Tahu Kukutai, Ella Pēpi Tarapa‐Dewes
article en

Abstract

In Te Ao Māori, whakapapa is a sacred framework that connects all aspects of existence. Whakapapa is highly sensitive information and a taonga that requires active protection. But what can be considered whakapapa data in a digital age where data linkage is ubiquitous and the boundaries between personal and collective information are increasingly blurred? We explore this question through a case study with Ngāti Tiipa, a hapū that is actively engaged in its own data sovereignty research. Reflexive thematic analysis of whānau kōrero identified three types of whakapapa data, each denoting a specific kind of connection: 1) between relatives, both living and deceased; 2) between people and places of cultural significance; and 3) between people and the spiritual realm. Whānau concepts of whakapapa data tend to be context-specific, suggesting that it is more useful to think of whakapapa data as dynamic and relational rather than a fixed, inherent attribute.

Journal of the Royal Society of New ZealandVol. 56(1)
University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.