Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer

We investigate the applicability of the Condon approximation (i.e., the notion that the diabatic coupling is invariant to geometry) in the context of both electron transfer (ET) and triplet energy transfer (TET) and compare the two cases. Although it is well appreciated that diabatic couplings usually arise from the interactions of electronic wave function tails, we show that ET tails are very different from TET tails. Using a simple model problem, our analysis explains in detail why the rates of TET decays with twice the rate of ET, while also leading to the hypothesis that the smaller diabatic couplings found for TET (versus ET) should imply more sensitivity to non-Condon fluctuations. As an example, for the classic sets of molecules investigated by Closs, we show that the Condon approximation is indeed less applicable for TET than for ET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01734
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer

Tian Qiu, Jennifer R. DeRosa, Joseph E. Subotnik, D Vale Cofer-Shabica
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
article

Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer

Tian Qiu, Jennifer R. DeRosa, Joseph E. Subotnik, D Vale Cofer-Shabica
article en

Abstract

We investigate the applicability of the Condon approximation (i.e., the notion that the diabatic coupling is invariant to geometry) in the context of both electron transfer (ET) and triplet energy transfer (TET) and compare the two cases. Although it is well appreciated that diabatic couplings usually arise from the interactions of electronic wave function tails, we show that ET tails are very different from TET tails. Using a simple model problem, our analysis explains in detail why the rates of TET decays with twice the rate of ET, while also leading to the hypothesis that the smaller diabatic couplings found for TET (versus ET) should imply more sensitivity to non-Condon fluctuations. As an example, for the classic sets of molecules investigated by Closs, we show that the Condon approximation is indeed less applicable for TET than for ET.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 22(4)
Princeton University (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.