The Legitimacy of Child Guardianship in Orphanages at the Mandailing Natal Regency Orphanage Foundation

This study discusses the procedures and validity of at the Mandailing Natal regency orphanage foundation. This study uses a normative-empirical legal method through literature study and field data collection, which is analyzed qualitatively to compare legal provisions with child guardianship practices in orphanages. The results show that the guardianship process at the Mandailing Natal regency orphanage foundation is carried out in a simple manner, generally based only on a statement letter from the parents, without going through a court decision. This occurs because most of the children come from poor families or their origins are unknown, so the transfer of guardianship is carried out informally. However, legally, the foundation does not have the status of a legal guardian without an official appointment from a judge or through a parental will. The foundation’s ignorance of legal procedures also contributes to the lack of legality of guardianship. As a result, even though the foundation performs a caregiving function, legally they do not have full authority over the foster children. Therefore, formal legal steps are needed to ensure that the guardianship status complies with the provisions of the law and regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18523848
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legitimacy of Child Guardianship in Orphanages at the Mandailing Natal Regency Orphanage Foundation

Alwi Ibrahim Lubis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

The Legitimacy of Child Guardianship in Orphanages at the Mandailing Natal Regency Orphanage Foundation

Alwi Ibrahim Lubis
article en

Abstract

This study discusses the procedures and validity of at the Mandailing Natal regency orphanage foundation. This study uses a normative-empirical legal method through literature study and field data collection, which is analyzed qualitatively to compare legal provisions with child guardianship practices in orphanages. The results show that the guardianship process at the Mandailing Natal regency orphanage foundation is carried out in a simple manner, generally based only on a statement letter from the parents, without going through a court decision. This occurs because most of the children come from poor families or their origins are unknown, so the transfer of guardianship is carried out informally. However, legally, the foundation does not have the status of a legal guardian without an official appointment from a judge or through a parental will. The foundation’s ignorance of legal procedures also contributes to the lack of legality of guardianship. As a result, even though the foundation performs a caregiving function, legally they do not have full authority over the foster children. Therefore, formal legal steps are needed to ensure that the guardianship status complies with the provisions of the law and regulations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.