The Interplay of Climate Change, Urbanisation, and Species Traits Shapes European Butterfly Population Trends

ABSTRACT Aim To examine how butterfly population trends respond to climate change and urbanisation at a continental scale, and whether responses differ between urban and rural environments. Location 869 sites across 12 European countries, spanning six bioclimatic zones. Time Period 1976–2021. Major Taxa Studied Butterflies (Lepidoptera). Methods We analysed long‐term monitoring data from > 8400 populations of 145 species representing a wide range of ecological and life‐history traits. Population trends were modelled in relation to climate variables (temperature, precipitation and aridity), urbanisation (built‐up surface), and their interactions with urban context (urban vs. rural) and species traits (trophic specialisation, body size, reproductive rate and thermal adaptation). Results Climate warming and aridification were consistently linked to population declines in both rural and urban contexts, while precipitation effects varied by location and species. Urbanisation alone did not predict trends, but the urban–rural context strongly modulated species' responses to warming, indicating potential synergies between climate change and urbanisation. The stronger impact of warming in urban populations likely reflects elevated baseline temperatures and reduced habitat suitability and connectivity in urban landscapes, limiting thermal buffering. Species with colder thermal niches and lower reproductive rates were most vulnerable to warming, as warming exceeds the thermal optima of cold‐adapted species and lower reproductive rates limit their capacity to buffer climate‐driven population declines. Under aridification, which can reduce host‐plant availability, trophic specialists declined more in urban areas, whereas generalists unexpectedly declined more in rural sites, suggesting context‐dependent constraints under increasing water limitation. Main Conclusions Our findings highlight the complex interplay between climate change, urban context, and species traits in driving population dynamics. Importantly, our results suggest that urbanisation generally amplifies the negative impact of climate change on insect population trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70204
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interplay of Climate Change, Urbanisation, and Species Traits Shapes European Butterfly Population Trends

Ashley Tejeda, Xavier Mestdagh, Nicolas Titeux, Benoît Fontaine et al.
2 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Species Distribution and Climate Change
66.98
article

The Interplay of Climate Change, Urbanisation, and Species Traits Shapes European Butterfly Population Trends

Ashley Tejeda, Xavier Mestdagh, Nicolas Titeux, Benoît Fontaine, Javier Gordillo, Reto Schmucki, Mikko Kuussaari, Miguel L. Munguira, Simona Bonelli, Pau Colom, Josef Settele, Yolanda Melero, Dirk Maes, Martin Musche, Martina Šašić, Johannes Rüdisser, Lars B. Pettersson, Chris van Swaay, David Roy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To examine how butterfly population trends respond to climate change and urbanisation at a continental scale, and whether responses differ between urban and rural environments. Location 869 sites across 12 European countries, spanning six bioclimatic zones. Time Period 1976–2021. Major Taxa Studied Butterflies (Lepidoptera). Methods We analysed long‐term monitoring data from > 8400 populations of 145 species representing a wide range of ecological and life‐history traits. Population trends were modelled in relation to climate variables (temperature, precipitation and aridity), urbanisation (built‐up surface), and their interactions with urban context (urban vs. rural) and species traits (trophic specialisation, body size, reproductive rate and thermal adaptation). Results Climate warming and aridification were consistently linked to population declines in both rural and urban contexts, while precipitation effects varied by location and species. Urbanisation alone did not predict trends, but the urban–rural context strongly modulated species' responses to warming, indicating potential synergies between climate change and urbanisation. The stronger impact of warming in urban populations likely reflects elevated baseline temperatures and reduced habitat suitability and connectivity in urban landscapes, limiting thermal buffering. Species with colder thermal niches and lower reproductive rates were most vulnerable to warming, as warming exceeds the thermal optima of cold‐adapted species and lower reproductive rates limit their capacity to buffer climate‐driven population declines. Under aridification, which can reduce host‐plant availability, trophic specialists declined more in urban areas, whereas generalists unexpectedly declined more in rural sites, suggesting context‐dependent constraints under increasing water limitation. Main Conclusions Our findings highlight the complex interplay between climate change, urban context, and species traits in driving population dynamics. Importantly, our results suggest that urbanisation generally amplifies the negative impact of climate change on insect population trends.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 35(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Lund University (SE), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Research Institute for Nature and Forest (BE), University of Exeter (GB), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Hospital General de Granollers (ES), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU), Dutch Butterfly Conservation (NL), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), Czech Society for Butterfly and Moth Conservation (CZ), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Croatian Natural History Museum (HR), Department of Public Health (US), Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (FR), University of Turin (IT), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Lunds Universitet, Ministry of Environment, Naturvårdsverket, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Suomen Ympäristökeskus, Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
66.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.