Climate projections for Greece: Defining a regional sub-ensemble from the CMIP6 landscape

Abstract Most climate change impact studies, regardless of scope, traditionally rely on a predefined set of climate model simulations without thoroughly examining representativeness, model skill, and diversity. This approach risks overlooking regional nuances and limits the utility of projections for tailored adaptation strategies. In the Mediterranean—and particularly Greece, where climate risks are high—addressing these limitations is essential for reliable, actionable projections. The CMIP6 ensemble is extensive, but its size and internal variability pose challenges for regional use, leaving users to navigate an “ensemble of opportunity” with interdependent models and diverse historical and future behaviors. Here we evaluate 35 CMIP6 models over Greece against bias-adjusted GSWP3-W5E5 observations, assessing both annual and seasonal historical performance with multiple diagnostics (correlation, standard deviation, CRMSE, bias, RMSE) and summarizing skill via a composite Historical Performance Score (HPS): the harmonic mean of Taylor Skill Score (pattern fidelity) and a variability-aware bias score that penalizes systematic offsets relative to observed interannual variability. Future responses are analyzed for 2081–2100 (high-emission Shared Socioeconomic Pathway SSP5-8.5) using a quadrant framework based on temperature change ( $$\Delta$$ ) and late-century precipitation (); changes in maximum temperature ( $$\Delta$$ ) are also incorporated to characterize the amplification of hot conditions. By integrating model performance and ensemble spread, the methodology refines model selection to balance historical credibility with diversity of future outcomes, enabling compact regional sub-ensembles that capture the range from moderate to severe warming and from drier to wetter states. Results show that historical skill does not necessarily translate into capturing future extremes in warming or drying, but a carefully chosen sub-ensemble can maximize the range of $$\Delta$$ and outcomes while retaining high HPS. The EURO-CORDEX CMIP6 driving subset reflects central tendencies and underrepresents warmer-wetter boundary futures; at the same time, roughly half of its driving GCMs rank among the strongest historical performers for Greece by HPS, while the remainder are comparatively weak. These findings underscore the need for tailored, performance-and-spread-aware selection strategies to navigate complex multi-model ensembles in regional climate studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-026-06029-w
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate projections for Greece: Defining a regional sub-ensemble from the CMIP6 landscape

Anastasios I. Stamou, Anna Karali, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Mihalis Lazaridis et al.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Climate variability and models
article

Climate projections for Greece: Defining a regional sub-ensemble from the CMIP6 landscape

Anastasios I. Stamou, Anna Karali, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Mihalis Lazaridis, C. Giannakopoulos, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Konstantinos V. Varotsos, Apostolos Voulgarakis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Most climate change impact studies, regardless of scope, traditionally rely on a predefined set of climate model simulations without thoroughly examining representativeness, model skill, and diversity. This approach risks overlooking regional nuances and limits the utility of projections for tailored adaptation strategies. In the Mediterranean—and particularly Greece, where climate risks are high—addressing these limitations is essential for reliable, actionable projections. The CMIP6 ensemble is extensive, but its size and internal variability pose challenges for regional use, leaving users to navigate an “ensemble of opportunity” with interdependent models and diverse historical and future behaviors. Here we evaluate 35 CMIP6 models over Greece against bias-adjusted GSWP3-W5E5 observations, assessing both annual and seasonal historical performance with multiple diagnostics (correlation, standard deviation, CRMSE, bias, RMSE) and summarizing skill via a composite Historical Performance Score (HPS): the harmonic mean of Taylor Skill Score (pattern fidelity) and a variability-aware bias score that penalizes systematic offsets relative to observed interannual variability. Future responses are analyzed for 2081–2100 (high-emission Shared Socioeconomic Pathway SSP5-8.5) using a quadrant framework based on temperature change ( $$\Delta$$ ) and late-century precipitation (); changes in maximum temperature ( $$\Delta$$ ) are also incorporated to characterize the amplification of hot conditions. By integrating model performance and ensemble spread, the methodology refines model selection to balance historical credibility with diversity of future outcomes, enabling compact regional sub-ensembles that capture the range from moderate to severe warming and from drier to wetter states. Results show that historical skill does not necessarily translate into capturing future extremes in warming or drying, but a carefully chosen sub-ensemble can maximize the range of $$\Delta$$ and outcomes while retaining high HPS. The EURO-CORDEX CMIP6 driving subset reflects central tendencies and underrepresents warmer-wetter boundary futures; at the same time, roughly half of its driving GCMs rank among the strongest historical performers for Greece by HPS, while the remainder are comparatively weak. These findings underscore the need for tailored, performance-and-spread-aware selection strategies to navigate complex multi-model ensembles in regional climate studies.

Theoretical and Applied ClimatologyVol. 157(2)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), National Observatory of Athens (GR), Technical University of Crete (GR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.