Clinicians’ Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives

Purpose: The increasing prevalence of cesarean delivery (CD) worldwide has raised concerns in healthcare and academic circles. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing obstetricians’ decisions regarding CD in Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving maternity clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to a stratified sample of obstetricians practicing in healthcare facilities across the region. The questionnaire included questions about participants’ demographics, preferences for the mode of delivery, and factors influencing decision-making. Data were analyzed using RStudio. Results: Infant and maternal safety, pain management, and long-term health implications were the main factors guiding CD decisions. Evidence-based medicine (EBM)-aligned practitioners were significantly less likely to perform non-medically indicated CS. Gender differences were observed, with female physicians more likely to prefer vaginal delivery. Partner influence and years of professional experience showed no significant effect on delivery preferences. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of EBM in guiding CD decisions and the need for open communication between healthcare providers and expectant parents. Future research with larger and more diverse samples could provide further insights into obstetricians’ decision-making processes. Keywords: cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, obstetrics, decision-making, healthcare providers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s562709
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians’ Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives

Sarah Y. Bahowarth, Sarah Aseeri, Yousef S Alghamdi, Anas Alyazidi et al.
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Clinicians’ Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives

Sarah Y. Bahowarth, Sarah Aseeri, Yousef S Alghamdi, Anas Alyazidi, Mohammed Sulaimani, Rawan Heggi, Rayyan Hasanain, Mersal Almanasif, Nashwa Aldardeir, Badr Alsulymani
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The increasing prevalence of cesarean delivery (CD) worldwide has raised concerns in healthcare and academic circles. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing obstetricians’ decisions regarding CD in Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving maternity clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to a stratified sample of obstetricians practicing in healthcare facilities across the region. The questionnaire included questions about participants’ demographics, preferences for the mode of delivery, and factors influencing decision-making. Data were analyzed using RStudio. Results: Infant and maternal safety, pain management, and long-term health implications were the main factors guiding CD decisions. Evidence-based medicine (EBM)-aligned practitioners were significantly less likely to perform non-medically indicated CS. Gender differences were observed, with female physicians more likely to prefer vaginal delivery. Partner influence and years of professional experience showed no significant effect on delivery preferences. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of EBM in guiding CD decisions and the need for open communication between healthcare providers and expectant parents. Future research with larger and more diverse samples could provide further insights into obstetricians’ decision-making processes. Keywords: cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, obstetrics, decision-making, healthcare providers

Risk Management and Healthcare PolicyVol. Volume 19
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinicians’ Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives — Sarah Y. Bahowarth, Sarah Aseeri, et al. · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS