Behind the scenes of lying – cognitive and emotional processes revealed by reaction times and self-reports

= 48), participants conducted a modified version of the Sheffield Lie Test, providing truthful and deceptive responses to neutral and mock-crime-related questions. After each block, participants rated their cognitive and emotional load, as well as specific subprocesses. Results revealed robust main effects of instruction and question type. Lying led to longer reaction times and higher self-reported cognitive and emotional load than telling the truth, and the same was true for mock-crime-related compared to neutral questions. No interaction was observed. Subjective ratings indicated that the most pronounced cognitive processes during lying were response inhibition and task switching, and nervousness and fear the emotional ones. These findings extend previous research by providing strong evidence that lying is not only cognitively but also emotionally demanding, highlighting the need for a comprehensive theoretical framework that integrates both mechanisms. It also provides first information which specific cognitive and emotional processes may be the most relevant.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2726517
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behind the scenes of lying – cognitive and emotional processes revealed by reaction times and self-reports

Tabea Wächtershäuser, Kristina Suchotzki
Cognition & Emotion
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Behind the scenes of lying – cognitive and emotional processes revealed by reaction times and self-reports

Tabea Wächtershäuser, Kristina Suchotzki
article en

Abstract

= 48), participants conducted a modified version of the Sheffield Lie Test, providing truthful and deceptive responses to neutral and mock-crime-related questions. After each block, participants rated their cognitive and emotional load, as well as specific subprocesses. Results revealed robust main effects of instruction and question type. Lying led to longer reaction times and higher self-reported cognitive and emotional load than telling the truth, and the same was true for mock-crime-related compared to neutral questions. No interaction was observed. Subjective ratings indicated that the most pronounced cognitive processes during lying were response inhibition and task switching, and nervousness and fear the emotional ones. These findings extend previous research by providing strong evidence that lying is not only cognitively but also emotionally demanding, highlighting the need for a comprehensive theoretical framework that integrates both mechanisms. It also provides first information which specific cognitive and emotional processes may be the most relevant.

Cognition & Emotion
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.