ESG PRESSURES IN BANK AND FINTECH LENDING: STRUCTURAL SHIFTS AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION OUTCOMES

This paper examines how ESG pressures are reshaping lending practices in banks and FinTech firms, driving structural shifts that influence financial inclusion. Drawing on recent empirical and theoretical evidence, the study analyzes how ESG criteria are embedded in credit allocation and how adoption differs between traditional banks and FinTech lenders. Banks integrate ESG primarily through formal risk-assessment models and regulatory compliance, whereas FinTechs rely on technological innovation, data analytics, and alternative scoring methods. These differences produce distinct outcomes: banks improve inclusion indirectly via transparency and risk management, while FinTechs extend credit more directly to underserved populations. Nonetheless, reliance on algorithmic models raises concerns regarding fairness, bias, and ESG consistency. The findings highlight ESG as a transformative force in lending, with its effectiveness in promoting sustainable and inclusive finance contingent on the interplay between regulatory frameworks and technological capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG PRESSURES IN BANK AND FINTECH LENDING: STRUCTURAL SHIFTS AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION OUTCOMES

SMĂRĂNDESCU ANDREI
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

ESG PRESSURES IN BANK AND FINTECH LENDING: STRUCTURAL SHIFTS AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION OUTCOMES

SMĂRĂNDESCU ANDREI
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how ESG pressures are reshaping lending practices in banks and FinTech firms, driving structural shifts that influence financial inclusion. Drawing on recent empirical and theoretical evidence, the study analyzes how ESG criteria are embedded in credit allocation and how adoption differs between traditional banks and FinTech lenders. Banks integrate ESG primarily through formal risk-assessment models and regulatory compliance, whereas FinTechs rely on technological innovation, data analytics, and alternative scoring methods. These differences produce distinct outcomes: banks improve inclusion indirectly via transparency and risk management, while FinTechs extend credit more directly to underserved populations. Nonetheless, reliance on algorithmic models raises concerns regarding fairness, bias, and ESG consistency. The findings highlight ESG as a transformative force in lending, with its effectiveness in promoting sustainable and inclusive finance contingent on the interplay between regulatory frameworks and technological capabilities.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Craiova (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.