Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease By Disease Location: Results from the EVOLVE Expansion Study

Goals: This analysis compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in biologic-naive patients by CD location. Background: Crohn's disease (CD) location may affect disease course and treatment decisions. Study: Medical charts of biologic-naive patients with CD aged 18 years or older initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab were analyzed in the multicenter, observational, retrospective EVOLVE Expansion study. Outcomes with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab over 36 months were compared in patients with baseline isolated ileal, ileocolonic, and isolated colonic CD (Montreal classification). Results: This analysis included 293 patients with ileal (vedolizumab, n=158, ustekinumab, n=135), 185 with ileocolonic (vedolizumab, n=91, ustekinumab, n=94), and 121 with colonic (vedolizumab, n=84, ustekinumab, n=37) CD. Cumulative rates over 36 months were similar between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in ileal, ileocolonic, and colonic CD subgroups for clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence. There were no differences in risks of serious adverse events, serious infections, CD exacerbations, and CD-related hospitalizations between cohorts across disease location; the risk of CD-related surgeries was similar in patients with ileocolonic and colonic CD, and higher with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in patients with ileal CD. CD-related surgeries for ileal CD were reported in 12 of 158 (7.6%) vedolizumab-treated patients and 3 of 135 (2.2%) ustekinumab-treated patients. Conclusions: Effectiveness, safety, and health care resource utilization outcomes over 36 months were similar between treatment cohorts regardless of baseline disease location. The number of patients requiring CD-related surgeries was low. Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be used as first-line biologics in patients with CD, regardless of disease location.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291068
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease By Disease Location: Results from the EVOLVE Expansion Study

Pravin Kamble, Zeinab Farhat, Lauren Gianchetti, Celine Gisler et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease By Disease Location: Results from the EVOLVE Expansion Study

Pravin Kamble, Zeinab Farhat, Lauren Gianchetti, Celine Gisler, Shashi Adsul, Brian Bressler, Neil R Brett, Britt Christensen, Marc Ferrante
article en

Abstract

Goals: This analysis compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in biologic-naive patients by CD location. Background: Crohn's disease (CD) location may affect disease course and treatment decisions. Study: Medical charts of biologic-naive patients with CD aged 18 years or older initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab were analyzed in the multicenter, observational, retrospective EVOLVE Expansion study. Outcomes with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab over 36 months were compared in patients with baseline isolated ileal, ileocolonic, and isolated colonic CD (Montreal classification). Results: This analysis included 293 patients with ileal (vedolizumab, n=158, ustekinumab, n=135), 185 with ileocolonic (vedolizumab, n=91, ustekinumab, n=94), and 121 with colonic (vedolizumab, n=84, ustekinumab, n=37) CD. Cumulative rates over 36 months were similar between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in ileal, ileocolonic, and colonic CD subgroups for clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence. There were no differences in risks of serious adverse events, serious infections, CD exacerbations, and CD-related hospitalizations between cohorts across disease location; the risk of CD-related surgeries was similar in patients with ileocolonic and colonic CD, and higher with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in patients with ileal CD. CD-related surgeries for ileal CD were reported in 12 of 158 (7.6%) vedolizumab-treated patients and 3 of 135 (2.2%) ustekinumab-treated patients. Conclusions: Effectiveness, safety, and health care resource utilization outcomes over 36 months were similar between treatment cohorts regardless of baseline disease location. The number of patients requiring CD-related surgeries was low. Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be used as first-line biologics in patients with CD, regardless of disease location.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.