Tree Regeneration After Unprecedented Forest Disturbances in Central Europe Is Robust but Maladapted to Future Climate Change

Central Europe has been a hotspot of forest disturbance during 2018-2020, with large pulses of tree mortality from drought and bark beetles. Post-disturbance recovery is crucial for forest resilience and the continued provision of ecosystem services. We surveyed 849 plots in disturbance hotspots across 10 Central European countries to assess the state of early (3-5 years) post-disturbance tree regeneration. Our specific objectives were to quantify post-disturbance tree recovery, identify key drivers, and assess future trajectories using model-based analyses. We found robust tree recovery throughout Central Europe, with median stem densities of 4750 n ha<sup>-1</sup>. Only 7% of plots had no regeneration. Regeneration density increased with precipitation, particularly at warm sites, and decreased with disturbance severity and size. The most frequently regenerating tree species was Picea abies (present on 48% of plots), a species that is poorly adapted to future heat and drought. Overall, we found that 75% of the currently established trees are projected to be outside of their climatic niche by the end of the century under moderate climate change (RCP4.5). We conclude that while Central European forests recover well from recent disturbances, they lack sufficient post-disturbance reorganization to enable sufficient adaptation to future climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70734
Primary Topic
Tree-ring climate responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tree Regeneration After Unprecedented Forest Disturbances in Central Europe Is Robust but Maladapted to Future Climate Change

Lisa Geres, Mária Potterf, Kirsten Krüger, Lisa Mandl et al.
Global Change Biology
Tree-ring climate responses
article

Tree Regeneration After Unprecedented Forest Disturbances in Central Europe Is Robust but Maladapted to Future Climate Change

Lisa Geres, Mária Potterf, Kirsten Krüger, Lisa Mandl, Kristin H. Braziunas, Christina Dollinger, Paulina Pinto, André Erhardt, Ana Stritih, Cornelius Senf, Roman Modlinger, Rupert Seidl, Marc Grünig, Werner Rammer, Christian Schattenberg, S. Seibold, Tobias Richter, Jörg Müller, Kilian Hochholzer, Johannes Mohr, Dominik Thom, Alba Viana‐Soto, Jonas Kerber, Anne Huber, Jiayun Zou, Miguel Muñoz Mazón, Judit Lecina‐Diaz, Tomáš Hlásny, Josep M. Serra‐Diaz, Sina Greiner, Jean‐Claude Gégout
article en

Abstract

Central Europe has been a hotspot of forest disturbance during 2018-2020, with large pulses of tree mortality from drought and bark beetles. Post-disturbance recovery is crucial for forest resilience and the continued provision of ecosystem services. We surveyed 849 plots in disturbance hotspots across 10 Central European countries to assess the state of early (3-5 years) post-disturbance tree regeneration. Our specific objectives were to quantify post-disturbance tree recovery, identify key drivers, and assess future trajectories using model-based analyses. We found robust tree recovery throughout Central Europe, with median stem densities of 4750 n ha<sup>-1</sup>. Only 7% of plots had no regeneration. Regeneration density increased with precipitation, particularly at warm sites, and decreased with disturbance severity and size. The most frequently regenerating tree species was Picea abies (present on 48% of plots), a species that is poorly adapted to future heat and drought. Overall, we found that 75% of the currently established trees are projected to be outside of their climatic niche by the end of the century under moderate climate change (RCP4.5). We conclude that while Central European forests recover well from recent disturbances, they lack sufficient post-disturbance reorganization to enable sufficient adaptation to future climate.

Global Change BiologyVol. 32(2)
Harvard University (US), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Basel (CH), University of Washington (US), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), AgroParisTech (FR), University of Würzburg (DE), Bavarian Forest National Park (DE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Botànic de Barcelona (ES), Silva (FR), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Národní Agentura pro Zemědělský Výzkum, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Tree-ring climate responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.