A robo-advisor system: Von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility modelling via pairwise comparisons

Abstract We introduce a robo-advisor system that recommends personalized investment portfolios to users, using a Von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility model elicited from pairwise comparison data. The robo-advisor system comprises three fundamental components. First, we employ a static preference questionnaire approach to generate pairwise lotteries comparison questions. Next, we design three optimization-based preference elicitation approaches to estimate the nominal utility function pessimistically, optimistically and neutrally. In the preference elicitation process, we assume that the user’s pairwise choices are exactly consistent with her/his true utility, without any response error. Finally, we compute portfolios based on the nominal utility using an expected utility maximization model. We conduct a series of numerical tests on a simulated user and some human participants to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed robo-advisor system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpag006
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A robo-advisor system: Von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility modelling via pairwise comparisons

Jia Liu, Bo Chen
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

A robo-advisor system: Von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility modelling via pairwise comparisons

Jia Liu, Bo Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract We introduce a robo-advisor system that recommends personalized investment portfolios to users, using a Von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility model elicited from pairwise comparison data. The robo-advisor system comprises three fundamental components. First, we employ a static preference questionnaire approach to generate pairwise lotteries comparison questions. Next, we design three optimization-based preference elicitation approaches to estimate the nominal utility function pessimistically, optimistically and neutrally. In the preference elicitation process, we assume that the user’s pairwise choices are exactly consistent with her/his true utility, without any response error. Finally, we compute portfolios based on the nominal utility using an expected utility maximization model. We conduct a series of numerical tests on a simulated user and some human participants to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed robo-advisor system.

IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.