Artificial Intelligence as a "Mixed Blessing" in Online Higher Education: A Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) Perspective

Abstract: Guided by the Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) framework, this study examined whether artificial intelligence (AI) functions as a mixed blessing in higher education by testing its relationships with perceived learning quality and academic effort and by assessing the moderating role of instructor guidance. Using quantitative, nonexperimental correlational design, survey data were collected from 182 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in higher education courses where AI tools were available. Measures assessed AI use, perceived learning quality, academic effort, and instructor guidance. Data were analyzed using correlation, linear regression, and moderated regression techniques. Results showed that AI use was positively associated with perceived learning quality (β = .21, p = .005, R² = .04) but negatively associated with academic effort (β = −.26, p < .001, R² = .06). Instructor guidance significantly moderated both relationships, strengthening the positive association between AI use and learning quality (β = .19, p = .003, ΔR² = .03) and reducing the negative association between AI use and academic effort (β = .22, p = .001, ΔR² = .04). All four null hypotheses were rejected. These findings demonstrate that AI’s impact on learning is conditional rather than uniform. While AI use may enhance perceived learning quality, it may also reduce academic effort unless guided by clear instructional expectations. The study provides empirical support for HC-AI-TP by showing that teaching presence is the central mechanism through which AI supports meaningful learning while preserving student effort. The results help explain inconsistent findings in prior research and underscore the importance of human-centered instructional guidance in AI-enabled higher education. Keywords: artificial intelligence, teaching presence, learning quality, academic effort, higher education. Title: Artificial Intelligence as a “Mixed Blessing” in Online Higher Education: A Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) Perspective Author: Dr. David Augustine Bull International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Research ISSN 2348-1196 (print), ISSN 2348-120X (online) Vol. 14, Issue 1, January 2026 - March 2026 Page No: 88-103 Research Publish Journals Website: www.researchpublish.com Published Date: 02-February-2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18458137 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/artificial-intelligence-as-a-mixed-blessing-in-online-higher-education-a-human-centered-aiteaching-presence-hc-ai-tp-perspective

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18458136
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence as a "Mixed Blessing" in Online Higher Education: A Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) Perspective

David Augustine Bull
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Artificial Intelligence as a "Mixed Blessing" in Online Higher Education: A Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) Perspective

David Augustine Bull
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Guided by the Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) framework, this study examined whether artificial intelligence (AI) functions as a mixed blessing in higher education by testing its relationships with perceived learning quality and academic effort and by assessing the moderating role of instructor guidance. Using quantitative, nonexperimental correlational design, survey data were collected from 182 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in higher education courses where AI tools were available. Measures assessed AI use, perceived learning quality, academic effort, and instructor guidance. Data were analyzed using correlation, linear regression, and moderated regression techniques. Results showed that AI use was positively associated with perceived learning quality (β = .21, p = .005, R² = .04) but negatively associated with academic effort (β = −.26, p < .001, R² = .06). Instructor guidance significantly moderated both relationships, strengthening the positive association between AI use and learning quality (β = .19, p = .003, ΔR² = .03) and reducing the negative association between AI use and academic effort (β = .22, p = .001, ΔR² = .04). All four null hypotheses were rejected. These findings demonstrate that AI’s impact on learning is conditional rather than uniform. While AI use may enhance perceived learning quality, it may also reduce academic effort unless guided by clear instructional expectations. The study provides empirical support for HC-AI-TP by showing that teaching presence is the central mechanism through which AI supports meaningful learning while preserving student effort. The results help explain inconsistent findings in prior research and underscore the importance of human-centered instructional guidance in AI-enabled higher education. Keywords: artificial intelligence, teaching presence, learning quality, academic effort, higher education. Title: Artificial Intelligence as a “Mixed Blessing” in Online Higher Education: A Human-Centered AI–Teaching Presence (HC-AI-TP) Perspective Author: Dr. David Augustine Bull International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Research ISSN 2348-1196 (print), ISSN 2348-120X (online) Vol. 14, Issue 1, January 2026 - March 2026 Page No: 88-103 Research Publish Journals Website: www.researchpublish.com Published Date: 02-February-2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18458137 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/artificial-intelligence-as-a-mixed-blessing-in-online-higher-education-a-human-centered-aiteaching-presence-hc-ai-tp-perspective

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.