Clinical guidelines on self-harm and suicide prevention: taking uncertainty into account in the evidence base

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline for self-harm advises against the use of risk assessment tools to predict future occurrence of repeat self-harm or suicide in individuals who have self-harmed, or to inform decisions regarding their treatment and discharge. In this perspective article, we discuss shortcomings in the process of developing this guideline, including: (1) limitations in the NICE evidence review underpinning these recommendations, which resulted in very minimal evidence being included; (2) developing definitive recommendations and drawing strong conclusions regarding the limited predictive ability and potential harms of tools, which were almost entirely based on the committee's expertise and experience and (3) not acknowledging the uncertainty and gaps in the evidence base, particularly around model impact, acceptability and feasibility. We highlight new evidence since this 2022 guideline, including examples of international work assessing model implementation and cost-effectiveness. We propose that there is an urgent need for more rigorous primary research assessing model impact, feasibility and acceptability, as well as empirical work addressing concerns about potential harms and misuse of tools, notably the denial of care. While prediction models should not be prematurely implemented in clinical practice without adequate validation and impact assessment, well-developed and validated tools in this area have the potential to improve clinical care for individuals who self-harm. Future updates to the guideline should be informed by emerging higher quality evidence in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Mental Health
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-302420
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
88.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical guidelines on self-harm and suicide prevention: taking uncertainty into account in the evidence base

Aida Seyedsalehi, Seena Fazel
2 citations
BMJ Mental Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
88.22
article

Clinical guidelines on self-harm and suicide prevention: taking uncertainty into account in the evidence base

Aida Seyedsalehi, Seena Fazel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline for self-harm advises against the use of risk assessment tools to predict future occurrence of repeat self-harm or suicide in individuals who have self-harmed, or to inform decisions regarding their treatment and discharge. In this perspective article, we discuss shortcomings in the process of developing this guideline, including: (1) limitations in the NICE evidence review underpinning these recommendations, which resulted in very minimal evidence being included; (2) developing definitive recommendations and drawing strong conclusions regarding the limited predictive ability and potential harms of tools, which were almost entirely based on the committee's expertise and experience and (3) not acknowledging the uncertainty and gaps in the evidence base, particularly around model impact, acceptability and feasibility. We highlight new evidence since this 2022 guideline, including examples of international work assessing model implementation and cost-effectiveness. We propose that there is an urgent need for more rigorous primary research assessing model impact, feasibility and acceptability, as well as empirical work addressing concerns about potential harms and misuse of tools, notably the denial of care. While prediction models should not be prematurely implemented in clinical practice without adequate validation and impact assessment, well-developed and validated tools in this area have the potential to improve clinical care for individuals who self-harm. Future updates to the guideline should be informed by emerging higher quality evidence in the field.

BMJ Mental HealthVol. 29(1)
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, University of Oxford, Clarendon Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
88.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical guidelines on self-harm and suicide prevention: taking uncertainty into account in the evidence base — Aida Seyedsalehi, Seena Fazel · BMJ Mental Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS