Effect of ballast track structures on the crosswind aerodynamics of a high-speed train on a bridge

This study investigates the aerodynamic behavior of a high-speed train during bridge crossings under strong crosswind conditions, with a focus on the influence of different ballast track structures. Three ballast structures were compared: flat track, CRTS (China railway track system) III ballastless track, and ballasted track. Using a combination of wind tunnel experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, we analyze aerodynamic forces, flow field characteristics, and wind pressure distributions on the trains. The findings reveal that, on windward conditions, the side force coefficient (CFy) of the head train on flat embankments exceeds 130% compared to ballasted and CRTS III tracks, while the CFy of the middle train is only 30% of these values. In leeward conditions, the lift coefficient (CFz) shows significant differences, with flat embankments yielding CFz values of 63% and 69% for the head and middle trains, respectively. Additionally, under crosswinds, notable differences occur at the lower windward side due to flow separation at the bridge's leading edge. CFD analysis indicates that larger-scale gap flow occurs under flat embankments, resulting in more disruptive wake flows compared to other conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0302900
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of ballast track structures on the crosswind aerodynamics of a high-speed train on a bridge

Z. Xie, Eshuang Deng, Hui Li, Xuhui He
Physics of Fluids
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Effect of ballast track structures on the crosswind aerodynamics of a high-speed train on a bridge

Z. Xie, Eshuang Deng, Hui Li, Xuhui He
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the aerodynamic behavior of a high-speed train during bridge crossings under strong crosswind conditions, with a focus on the influence of different ballast track structures. Three ballast structures were compared: flat track, CRTS (China railway track system) III ballastless track, and ballasted track. Using a combination of wind tunnel experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, we analyze aerodynamic forces, flow field characteristics, and wind pressure distributions on the trains. The findings reveal that, on windward conditions, the side force coefficient (CFy) of the head train on flat embankments exceeds 130% compared to ballasted and CRTS III tracks, while the CFy of the middle train is only 30% of these values. In leeward conditions, the lift coefficient (CFz) shows significant differences, with flat embankments yielding CFz values of 63% and 69% for the head and middle trains, respectively. Additionally, under crosswinds, notable differences occur at the lower windward side due to flow separation at the bridge's leading edge. CFD analysis indicates that larger-scale gap flow occurs under flat embankments, resulting in more disruptive wake flows compared to other conditions.

Physics of FluidsVol. 38(2)
Central South University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of ballast track structures on the crosswind aerodynamics of a high-speed train on a bridge — Z. Xie, Eshuang Deng, et al. · Physics of Fluids (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS