Disastrous deductions?: Aid cuts and disaster governance in Malawi

Following the dismantling of USAID (United States Agency for International Development) in early 2025, this article draws on ethnographic fieldwork with government officials in Lilongwe and NGO staff in Malawi's southern districts to examine how aid cuts reshape disaster governance. The analysis demonstrates that reducing donor resources strains not only collaboration between state and non‐state actors but also state‐citizen relationships, as promises go unfulfilled and blame falls on local actors regardless of where decisions originate. While the aid sector now focuses on advocacy and alternative donors, the article argues that meaningful localization requires shifting decision‐making power, not just resources, to local actors such as government officials. Only then can the aid sector take responsibility for how it has shaped disaster governance in Malawi.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropology Today
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.70052
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disastrous deductions?: Aid cuts and disaster governance in Malawi

Tanja D. Hendriks, George W. Foden
Anthropology Today
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Disastrous deductions?: Aid cuts and disaster governance in Malawi

Tanja D. Hendriks, George W. Foden
article en

Abstract

Following the dismantling of USAID (United States Agency for International Development) in early 2025, this article draws on ethnographic fieldwork with government officials in Lilongwe and NGO staff in Malawi's southern districts to examine how aid cuts reshape disaster governance. The analysis demonstrates that reducing donor resources strains not only collaboration between state and non‐state actors but also state‐citizen relationships, as promises go unfulfilled and blame falls on local actors regardless of where decisions originate. While the aid sector now focuses on advocacy and alternative donors, the article argues that meaningful localization requires shifting decision‐making power, not just resources, to local actors such as government officials. Only then can the aid sector take responsibility for how it has shaped disaster governance in Malawi.

Anthropology TodayVol. 42(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.