ФІЛОСОФСЬКІ РОЗДУМИ ПРО ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ГЕНЕРАТИВНОГО ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ОСВІТІ

The study finds that the application of generative AI in the field of education has triggered three major philosophical dilemmas: first, the ontological crisis, where GenAI has jumped from a tool to a "cognitive agent", reconstructing the essence of educational existence; second, the epistemological rupture, where the hegemony of algorithmic knowledge suppresses critical thinking; third, the ethical and political conflicts, where the digital divide exacerbates educational inequality. Based on this, the study proposes a human-centered governance framework: at the philosophical level, ensuring that AI serves the all-round development of human beings; at the practical level, constructing a national ethical review mechanism and a governance system for cultivating teachers' "technical-humanistic" dual capabilities. The research confirms that only by taming instrumental rationality with value rationality can the dialectical transcendence of GenAI's educational application be realized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2026-02-05
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ФІЛОСОФСЬКІ РОЗДУМИ ПРО ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ГЕНЕРАТИВНОГО ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ОСВІТІ

Оlga Dolska, Вей Сунь
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

ФІЛОСОФСЬКІ РОЗДУМИ ПРО ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ГЕНЕРАТИВНОГО ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ОСВІТІ

Оlga Dolska, Вей Сунь
article en

Abstract

The study finds that the application of generative AI in the field of education has triggered three major philosophical dilemmas: first, the ontological crisis, where GenAI has jumped from a tool to a "cognitive agent", reconstructing the essence of educational existence; second, the epistemological rupture, where the hegemony of algorithmic knowledge suppresses critical thinking; third, the ethical and political conflicts, where the digital divide exacerbates educational inequality. Based on this, the study proposes a human-centered governance framework: at the philosophical level, ensuring that AI serves the all-round development of human beings; at the practical level, constructing a national ethical review mechanism and a governance system for cultivating teachers' "technical-humanistic" dual capabilities. The research confirms that only by taming instrumental rationality with value rationality can the dialectical transcendence of GenAI's educational application be realized.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.