High- and Low-Dose Oral Sesame Immunotherapy: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Single-Center Open-Label Trial

Joanna Zielińska,* Anna Krupa-Łaska,* Marek Kulus, Katarzyna Grzela Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Katarzyna Grzela, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, 63A Zwirki i Wigury Street, Warsaw, 02-091, Poland, Email [email protected]: To compare the efficacy and safety of two sesame protein maintenance doses (300 mg vs 1200 mg) in pediatric oral immunotherapy (OIT) for sesame allergy.Patients and Methods: In this randomized, single-center, open-label trial (NCT05158413), 26 children aged 4– 17 years with confirmed sesame allergy were allocated 1:1 to receive either 300 mg or 1200 mg sesame protein as maintenance therapy following dose escalation. Inclusion criteria included positive skin prick test (SPT) and/or elevated sesame-specific IgE (sIgE), as well as clinical reactivity during oral food challenge (OFC). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients tolerating 4000 mg of sesame protein at the end-of-treatment OFC. Secondary outcomes included changes in immunologic markers (SPT wheal size, sIgE, IgG4) and safety.Results: The rate of negative OFCs in our study (81.8% in the high-dose group and 69.2% in the low-dose group; p = 0.649) was comparable to outcomes reported in previous sesame OIT trials (19– 22), indicating similar efficacy across different maintenance dose regimens. Both groups showed significant reductions in SPT wheal size and increases in sesame-specific IgG4 (p 

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-02-05
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High- and Low-Dose Oral Sesame Immunotherapy: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Single-Center Open-Label Trial

Katarzyna Grzela, Marek Kulus, Anna Krupa-Łaska, Joanna Zielińska
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

High- and Low-Dose Oral Sesame Immunotherapy: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Single-Center Open-Label Trial

Katarzyna Grzela, Marek Kulus, Anna Krupa-Łaska, Joanna Zielińska
article en

Abstract

Joanna Zielińska,* Anna Krupa-Łaska,* Marek Kulus, Katarzyna Grzela Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Katarzyna Grzela, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, 63A Zwirki i Wigury Street, Warsaw, 02-091, Poland, Email [email protected]: To compare the efficacy and safety of two sesame protein maintenance doses (300 mg vs 1200 mg) in pediatric oral immunotherapy (OIT) for sesame allergy.Patients and Methods: In this randomized, single-center, open-label trial (NCT05158413), 26 children aged 4– 17 years with confirmed sesame allergy were allocated 1:1 to receive either 300 mg or 1200 mg sesame protein as maintenance therapy following dose escalation. Inclusion criteria included positive skin prick test (SPT) and/or elevated sesame-specific IgE (sIgE), as well as clinical reactivity during oral food challenge (OFC). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients tolerating 4000 mg of sesame protein at the end-of-treatment OFC. Secondary outcomes included changes in immunologic markers (SPT wheal size, sIgE, IgG4) and safety.Results: The rate of negative OFCs in our study (81.8% in the high-dose group and 69.2% in the low-dose group; p = 0.649) was comparable to outcomes reported in previous sesame OIT trials (19– 22), indicating similar efficacy across different maintenance dose regimens. Both groups showed significant reductions in SPT wheal size and increases in sesame-specific IgG4 (p 

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.