SORS/WomenInBSC: algorithm design: the case of school choice

Algorithms play a central role in determining who gets what—and why—in a wide range of allocation problems. In the context of education, school assignment algorithms impact the opportunities and outcomes of millions of students worldwide. As administrative capacity to collect large-scale data and centralize decisions has grown, so has the potential to design better, fairer, and more efficient systems. In this lecture, we will explore school choice as a case study to illustrate how economic theory, behavioral experiments, rich datasets, and computational tools come together to inform the design of real-world matching algorithms. We will discuss how different designs can lead to vastly different outcomes, how evidence can uncover unintended consequences, and how iterative processes combining theory and empirical work can help create systems that are more transparent, equitable, and effective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Published
2025-05-26
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SORS/WomenInBSC: algorithm design: the case of school choice

Caterina Calsamiglia
UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

SORS/WomenInBSC: algorithm design: the case of school choice

Caterina Calsamiglia
article en

Abstract

Algorithms play a central role in determining who gets what—and why—in a wide range of allocation problems. In the context of education, school assignment algorithms impact the opportunities and outcomes of millions of students worldwide. As administrative capacity to collect large-scale data and centralize decisions has grown, so has the potential to design better, fairer, and more efficient systems. In this lecture, we will explore school choice as a case study to illustrate how economic theory, behavioral experiments, rich datasets, and computational tools come together to inform the design of real-world matching algorithms. We will discuss how different designs can lead to vastly different outcomes, how evidence can uncover unintended consequences, and how iterative processes combining theory and empirical work can help create systems that are more transparent, equitable, and effective.

UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.