Toward a Unified Theory of Understanding: A Conceptual Analysis for Natural and Artificial Understanding

Understanding is the foundational component of intelligence that makes adaptation to novel states possible. As artificial intelligence models advance toward artificial general and superintelligence, an objective, in contrast to human-centered, theory of understanding is required. One merit of an objective conceptual analysis of understanding is that it would unify human and artificial understanding. This study defines understanding as well-integrated use of reasoning across a network of conceptual, logical, and causal relationships, which are situated on an efficient conceptual web. A central evolutionary function of understanding is the capacity to generalize knowledge into novel situations. This renders machine learning’s concept of “generalization” a measure of understanding. The paper discusses two primary methods for assessing artificial understanding: behavioral methods measuring generalizability and mechanistic analyses revealing causal mechanisms of the neural network. We discuss the limitations of these methods. The most important problem, as this paper defends, is the difficulty of measuring objective understanding in contrast to human understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078526500050
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Unified Theory of Understanding: A Conceptual Analysis for Natural and Artificial Understanding

Hasan Çağatay
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Toward a Unified Theory of Understanding: A Conceptual Analysis for Natural and Artificial Understanding

Hasan Çağatay
article en

Abstract

Understanding is the foundational component of intelligence that makes adaptation to novel states possible. As artificial intelligence models advance toward artificial general and superintelligence, an objective, in contrast to human-centered, theory of understanding is required. One merit of an objective conceptual analysis of understanding is that it would unify human and artificial understanding. This study defines understanding as well-integrated use of reasoning across a network of conceptual, logical, and causal relationships, which are situated on an efficient conceptual web. A central evolutionary function of understanding is the capacity to generalize knowledge into novel situations. This renders machine learning’s concept of “generalization” a measure of understanding. The paper discusses two primary methods for assessing artificial understanding: behavioral methods measuring generalizability and mechanistic analyses revealing causal mechanisms of the neural network. We discuss the limitations of these methods. The most important problem, as this paper defends, is the difficulty of measuring objective understanding in contrast to human understanding.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.