Navigating Agentic AI: a call for reimagined academic literacies

The emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education raises a critical question: does the move toward autonomous systems capable of planning, decision-making, and action constitute a fundamental shift, or an acceleration of challenges already posed by generative AI? This article argues that these developments require a reimagining of academic literacies, extending beyond traditional emphases on critical thinking and academic writing toward a more comprehensive conception of AI literacy. Drawing on research in AI ethics and digital pedagogy, it explores the implications of learning in partnership with increasingly autonomous systems. It examines how agentic AI disrupts established understandings of authorship, assessment, and intellectual labour, and proposes a framework centred on critical evaluation, prompt literacy, co-authorship, ethical awareness, and recognition of AI limitations. Learning developers are positioned as central actors in this transition, with a key role in shaping pedagogy, assessment, and institutional policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)
Published
2026-01-28
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Agentic AI: a call for reimagined academic literacies

Sanjana Sudarshan, Octavio Murekian
Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)
Digital Education and Society
article

Navigating Agentic AI: a call for reimagined academic literacies

Sanjana Sudarshan, Octavio Murekian
article en

Abstract

The emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education raises a critical question: does the move toward autonomous systems capable of planning, decision-making, and action constitute a fundamental shift, or an acceleration of challenges already posed by generative AI? This article argues that these developments require a reimagining of academic literacies, extending beyond traditional emphases on critical thinking and academic writing toward a more comprehensive conception of AI literacy. Drawing on research in AI ethics and digital pedagogy, it explores the implications of learning in partnership with increasingly autonomous systems. It examines how agentic AI disrupts established understandings of authorship, assessment, and intellectual labour, and proposes a framework centred on critical evaluation, prompt literacy, co-authorship, ethical awareness, and recognition of AI limitations. Learning developers are positioned as central actors in this transition, with a key role in shaping pedagogy, assessment, and institutional policy.

Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.