Following Quantum Innovation Flows

Quantum technologies are central to the global innovation race. While national strategies are designed to secure technological sovereignty, the relationship between strategic timing and actual innovation output is complex. However, the fundamental question remains: does policy actively drive the innovation cycle or merely follow it? This study addresses this relationship by focusing on the temporal alignment between the release of national quantum strategies and the resulting patent application volume across countries (2014–2023). Utilizing PATSTAT data, with a focus on the patent application date, we establish that the global application peak occurred in 2022. This finding reveals a significant temporal paradox: while early movers like the US (National Strategic Overview for Quantum Information Systems and Related Documents, 2018) and the Netherlands (National Agenda for Quantum Technology, 2019) acted proactively, the majority of nations (including Germany, France, and Japan) released their strategies in 2023—after the innovation peak had already been reached. We further analyse the China situation (leading patent volume without a publicly available strategy) and the Netherlands paradox (early strategy despite low domestic patent count). The study's primary quantitative measure is the lag time between a strategy's publication date and the subsequent peak in a nation's domestic quantum patent applications. By analysing this temporal gap, the research provides empirical evidence to validate the effectiveness of strategic foresight versus reactive policymaking

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Published
2026-02-03
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Following Quantum Innovation Flows

Tamara Besednjak Valič, Karin Dobravc Škof
DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Following Quantum Innovation Flows

Tamara Besednjak Valič, Karin Dobravc Škof
article en

Abstract

Quantum technologies are central to the global innovation race. While national strategies are designed to secure technological sovereignty, the relationship between strategic timing and actual innovation output is complex. However, the fundamental question remains: does policy actively drive the innovation cycle or merely follow it? This study addresses this relationship by focusing on the temporal alignment between the release of national quantum strategies and the resulting patent application volume across countries (2014–2023). Utilizing PATSTAT data, with a focus on the patent application date, we establish that the global application peak occurred in 2022. This finding reveals a significant temporal paradox: while early movers like the US (National Strategic Overview for Quantum Information Systems and Related Documents, 2018) and the Netherlands (National Agenda for Quantum Technology, 2019) acted proactively, the majority of nations (including Germany, France, and Japan) released their strategies in 2023—after the innovation peak had already been reached. We further analyse the China situation (leading patent volume without a publicly available strategy) and the Netherlands paradox (early strategy despite low domestic patent count). The study's primary quantitative measure is the lag time between a strategy's publication date and the subsequent peak in a nation's domestic quantum patent applications. By analysing this temporal gap, the research provides empirical evidence to validate the effectiveness of strategic foresight versus reactive policymaking

DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.