Co‐Application of Biochar and Organic Matter With Synthetic Fertilisers Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Rice Yield and Benefit–Cost Ratio: A Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Optimising the efficiency of applied nitrogen (N) fertilisers is essential to sustain agricultural systems. Substantial N losses continue through leaching, volatilisation, and denitrification processes. Co‐application of organic amendments and biochar alongside synthetic fertilisers is a widely practiced strategy to enhance N retention, improve soil fertility and increase crop productivity. Previous studies have focused on the specific characteristics of soil amendments and the magnitude of yield change, while N use efficiency (NUE) and economic returns remain uncertain. This meta‐analysis examined the effects of synthetic fertiliser applied alone, co‐applied with biochar and co‐applied with organic amendments, on crop yield, plant N uptake, NUE and economic return within rice cropping systems. Synthetic fertiliser and biochar applied alone increased rice yield by 69.2% ± 30.3 and 33.4% ± 34.9, respectively (Bootstrap 95% CI), whereas yield further increased by co‐applying biochar (+104.8% ± 37.5) and organic amendments (+80.2% ± 18.2) with fertiliser compared with non‐fertilised control. Co‐applying organic amendments (+20.9% ± 29.7) and co‐applying biochar (+35.1% ± 18.3) with synthetic fertiliser increased NUE compared with fertilised control. For rice crops under low N application (< 150 kg ha −1 ), co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yields more than co‐applying organic amendments (+70.1% ± 0.7 vs. +52.5% ± 0.3, respectively). Within acidic soils, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser (+72.9% ± 0.4) led to higher yield than co‐applying organic matter (+36.0% ± 0.9), and among soils with high organic carbon concentration, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yield by 97.6% ± 1.6, compared with yield increases observed by co‐applying organic matter with fertiliser at 29.4% ± 0.5 and fertiliser alone at 25.6% ± 0.2. The main factors driving rice yield were N application rate, co‐application method and soil organic carbon concentration. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments did not significantly differ in benefit–cost ratio with benefit–cost ratios of 35.1% ± 9.2 and 18.1 ± 26.5, respectively compared with fertilised control. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments with synthetic fertilisers decreased N inputs and increased economic return, therefore improving sustainability in rice cropping systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70105
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐Application of Biochar and Organic Matter With Synthetic Fertilisers Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Rice Yield and Benefit–Cost Ratio: A Meta‐Analysis

Michael B. Farrar, Georgette Leah Burns, Md Hafiz All Hosen, Apurbo Kumar Chaki et al.
GCB Bioenergy
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Co‐Application of Biochar and Organic Matter With Synthetic Fertilisers Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Rice Yield and Benefit–Cost Ratio: A Meta‐Analysis

Michael B. Farrar, Georgette Leah Burns, Md Hafiz All Hosen, Apurbo Kumar Chaki, Brittany Elliott, Negar Omidvar, Tuan M. Nguyen, Mrinmoy Guha Neogi, Lakmini Dissanayake, Shilpi Das, Mehran Rezaei Rashti, Shahla Hosseini Bai, M. Wakilur Rahman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Optimising the efficiency of applied nitrogen (N) fertilisers is essential to sustain agricultural systems. Substantial N losses continue through leaching, volatilisation, and denitrification processes. Co‐application of organic amendments and biochar alongside synthetic fertilisers is a widely practiced strategy to enhance N retention, improve soil fertility and increase crop productivity. Previous studies have focused on the specific characteristics of soil amendments and the magnitude of yield change, while N use efficiency (NUE) and economic returns remain uncertain. This meta‐analysis examined the effects of synthetic fertiliser applied alone, co‐applied with biochar and co‐applied with organic amendments, on crop yield, plant N uptake, NUE and economic return within rice cropping systems. Synthetic fertiliser and biochar applied alone increased rice yield by 69.2% ± 30.3 and 33.4% ± 34.9, respectively (Bootstrap 95% CI), whereas yield further increased by co‐applying biochar (+104.8% ± 37.5) and organic amendments (+80.2% ± 18.2) with fertiliser compared with non‐fertilised control. Co‐applying organic amendments (+20.9% ± 29.7) and co‐applying biochar (+35.1% ± 18.3) with synthetic fertiliser increased NUE compared with fertilised control. For rice crops under low N application (< 150 kg ha −1 ), co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yields more than co‐applying organic amendments (+70.1% ± 0.7 vs. +52.5% ± 0.3, respectively). Within acidic soils, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser (+72.9% ± 0.4) led to higher yield than co‐applying organic matter (+36.0% ± 0.9), and among soils with high organic carbon concentration, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yield by 97.6% ± 1.6, compared with yield increases observed by co‐applying organic matter with fertiliser at 29.4% ± 0.5 and fertiliser alone at 25.6% ± 0.2. The main factors driving rice yield were N application rate, co‐application method and soil organic carbon concentration. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments did not significantly differ in benefit–cost ratio with benefit–cost ratios of 35.1% ± 9.2 and 18.1 ± 26.5, respectively compared with fertilised control. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments with synthetic fertilisers decreased N inputs and increased economic return, therefore improving sustainability in rice cropping systems.

GCB BioenergyVol. 18(3)
Griffith University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Bangladesh Agricultural University (BD), Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute (BD), Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (VN), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BD)
Griffith University, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.