Co‐Application of Biochar and Organic Matter With Synthetic Fertilisers Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Rice Yield and Benefit–Cost Ratio: A Meta‐Analysis
ABSTRACT Optimising the efficiency of applied nitrogen (N) fertilisers is essential to sustain agricultural systems. Substantial N losses continue through leaching, volatilisation, and denitrification processes. Co‐application of organic amendments and biochar alongside synthetic fertilisers is a widely practiced strategy to enhance N retention, improve soil fertility and increase crop productivity. Previous studies have focused on the specific characteristics of soil amendments and the magnitude of yield change, while N use efficiency (NUE) and economic returns remain uncertain. This meta‐analysis examined the effects of synthetic fertiliser applied alone, co‐applied with biochar and co‐applied with organic amendments, on crop yield, plant N uptake, NUE and economic return within rice cropping systems. Synthetic fertiliser and biochar applied alone increased rice yield by 69.2% ± 30.3 and 33.4% ± 34.9, respectively (Bootstrap 95% CI), whereas yield further increased by co‐applying biochar (+104.8% ± 37.5) and organic amendments (+80.2% ± 18.2) with fertiliser compared with non‐fertilised control. Co‐applying organic amendments (+20.9% ± 29.7) and co‐applying biochar (+35.1% ± 18.3) with synthetic fertiliser increased NUE compared with fertilised control. For rice crops under low N application (< 150 kg ha −1 ), co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yields more than co‐applying organic amendments (+70.1% ± 0.7 vs. +52.5% ± 0.3, respectively). Within acidic soils, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser (+72.9% ± 0.4) led to higher yield than co‐applying organic matter (+36.0% ± 0.9), and among soils with high organic carbon concentration, co‐applying biochar with fertiliser increased yield by 97.6% ± 1.6, compared with yield increases observed by co‐applying organic matter with fertiliser at 29.4% ± 0.5 and fertiliser alone at 25.6% ± 0.2. The main factors driving rice yield were N application rate, co‐application method and soil organic carbon concentration. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments did not significantly differ in benefit–cost ratio with benefit–cost ratios of 35.1% ± 9.2 and 18.1 ± 26.5, respectively compared with fertilised control. Co‐applying either biochar or organic amendments with synthetic fertilisers decreased N inputs and increased economic return, therefore improving sustainability in rice cropping systems.
Authors
- Michael B. Farrar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-0544)
- Georgette Leah Burns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-8061)
- Md Hafiz All Hosen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-6218)
- Apurbo Kumar Chaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-7438)
- Brittany Elliott
- Negar Omidvar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-2719)
- Tuan M. Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8592-1655)
- Mrinmoy Guha Neogi
- Lakmini Dissanayake
- Shilpi Das
- Mehran Rezaei Rashti
- Shahla Hosseini Bai
- M. Wakilur Rahman
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Bangladesh Agricultural University (BD)
- Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute (BD)
- Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (VN)
- Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BD)
Publication Details
- Journal
- GCB Bioenergy
- Published
- 2026-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70105
- Primary Topic
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Griffith University
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research