Impact of Spatial Scale on Optical Earth Observation‐Derived Seasonal Surface Water Extents

Abstract Landsat‐derived products are the most prominent, publicly available sources of large‐scale surface water extent data. However, few studies have assessed the limitations of spatial scale on such products. Here, we mapped seasonal surface water extents utilizing high‐resolution (4.77 m) PlanetScope Basemap imagery and machine learning. We conducted a pixel‐wise comparison of these high resolution classifications with a set of classifications from a moderate resolution (30 m) Landsat product. The vast majority (93%) of areas classified as water by the Landsat product were similarly classified by PlanetBasemap; however, only 65%–75% of the PlanetBasemap water area was also classified by the Landsat classes. Of the Landsat classes, only the partial surface water class comparably detects smaller water bodies (widths 50–70 m) with PlanetBasemaps. Our results indicate that higher resolution imagery detects more small water bodies, which are instrumental to better understanding flood dynamics, methane emissions, and downstream water volume and quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl119880
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Spatial Scale on Optical Earth Observation‐Derived Seasonal Surface Water Extents

Rebecca Composto, Vinicius Perin, Mirela G. Tulbure, Mollie D. Gaines et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Impact of Spatial Scale on Optical Earth Observation‐Derived Seasonal Surface Water Extents

Rebecca Composto, Vinicius Perin, Mirela G. Tulbure, Mollie D. Gaines, Varun Tiwari, Darcy Boast, Julio Canieta, Henry Castellanos Quiroz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Landsat‐derived products are the most prominent, publicly available sources of large‐scale surface water extent data. However, few studies have assessed the limitations of spatial scale on such products. Here, we mapped seasonal surface water extents utilizing high‐resolution (4.77 m) PlanetScope Basemap imagery and machine learning. We conducted a pixel‐wise comparison of these high resolution classifications with a set of classifications from a moderate resolution (30 m) Landsat product. The vast majority (93%) of areas classified as water by the Landsat product were similarly classified by PlanetBasemap; however, only 65%–75% of the PlanetBasemap water area was also classified by the Landsat classes. Of the Landsat classes, only the partial surface water class comparably detects smaller water bodies (widths 50–70 m) with PlanetBasemaps. Our results indicate that higher resolution imagery detects more small water bodies, which are instrumental to better understanding flood dynamics, methane emissions, and downstream water volume and quality.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(3)
Clark University (US), North Carolina State University (US), Planet Biotechnology (United States) (US), National Institute of Meteorology (TN)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, North Carolina State University, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.