Who Funds the Egg? Cracking the FOSS Funding Paradox

Every successful open source project starts small, but not every small project gets the chance to succeed. Here’s the paradox: funders prefer to back proven impact, yet impact requires early support. If new initiatives can’t access resources until they already “look successful,” we risk starving the very ecosystem that keeps open source innovative and diverse. This talk explores this chicken-and-egg dilemma and proposes ways to flip the script. What would it look like if we invested not only in impact already proven, but also in potential? Drawing from my experience building Pre-Seeds: Research 101, I’ll share insights into the struggles early-stage projects face (e.g., limited visibility, lack of credibility, and difficulty accessing networks). I'll also highlight the kinds of support that make a difference, sharing lessons on how these projects can be supported beyond grants. From spotlighting them on community stages and amplifying their voice online, to connecting them with mentors and fellowships — these “non-monetary investments” can bridge the gap until traditional funding becomes viable. Attendees will leave with concrete ideas for how they — as individuals, organisations, or communities — can sustain the pipeline of emerging projects, ensuring the long-term resilience of open source. If we want an open, thriving, and continuously renewing FOSS ecosystem, we need to get better at nurturing the eggs, not just celebrating the chickens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18492707
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Funds the Egg? Cracking the FOSS Funding Paradox

Deborah Udoh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Who Funds the Egg? Cracking the FOSS Funding Paradox

Deborah Udoh
article en

Abstract

Every successful open source project starts small, but not every small project gets the chance to succeed. Here’s the paradox: funders prefer to back proven impact, yet impact requires early support. If new initiatives can’t access resources until they already “look successful,” we risk starving the very ecosystem that keeps open source innovative and diverse. This talk explores this chicken-and-egg dilemma and proposes ways to flip the script. What would it look like if we invested not only in impact already proven, but also in potential? Drawing from my experience building Pre-Seeds: Research 101, I’ll share insights into the struggles early-stage projects face (e.g., limited visibility, lack of credibility, and difficulty accessing networks). I'll also highlight the kinds of support that make a difference, sharing lessons on how these projects can be supported beyond grants. From spotlighting them on community stages and amplifying their voice online, to connecting them with mentors and fellowships — these “non-monetary investments” can bridge the gap until traditional funding becomes viable. Attendees will leave with concrete ideas for how they — as individuals, organisations, or communities — can sustain the pipeline of emerging projects, ensuring the long-term resilience of open source. If we want an open, thriving, and continuously renewing FOSS ecosystem, we need to get better at nurturing the eggs, not just celebrating the chickens.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainability Institute (ZA), Software Sustainability Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.