Leading AI transformation: three approaches for CEOs

Purpose This paper examines how CEOs and managing directors lead AI transformation and how their leadership approaches shape organizational change. Design/methodology/approach The study draws on 31 qualitative interviews with CEOs and managing directors across diverse industries in Finland. Inductive thematic analysis is used to identify and compare distinct leadership approaches to AI transformation. Findings Three approaches are identified: Generalist, Expert, and Disruptive. Generalists delegate AI execution to specialists while maintaining strategic alignment and resource support. Experts lead hands-on, building AI capabilities and embedding AI into strategy and management practices. Disruptors treat AI as an existential shift and pursue bold moves, including business-model and market repositioning. The approaches differ in engagement level, scope of change, and typical risks. Originality/value The paper extends upper echelons and transformational leadership research by showing how CEOs’ personal orientation to AI shapes AI transformation outcomes, and it offers a practical framework for aligning leadership approach with AI maturity and strategic intent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategy and Leadership
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-12-2025-0433
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading AI transformation: three approaches for CEOs

Paavo Ritala, Mika Ruokonen
Strategy and Leadership
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Leading AI transformation: three approaches for CEOs

Paavo Ritala, Mika Ruokonen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines how CEOs and managing directors lead AI transformation and how their leadership approaches shape organizational change. Design/methodology/approach The study draws on 31 qualitative interviews with CEOs and managing directors across diverse industries in Finland. Inductive thematic analysis is used to identify and compare distinct leadership approaches to AI transformation. Findings Three approaches are identified: Generalist, Expert, and Disruptive. Generalists delegate AI execution to specialists while maintaining strategic alignment and resource support. Experts lead hands-on, building AI capabilities and embedding AI into strategy and management practices. Disruptors treat AI as an existential shift and pursue bold moves, including business-model and market repositioning. The approaches differ in engagement level, scope of change, and typical risks. Originality/value The paper extends upper echelons and transformational leadership research by showing how CEOs’ personal orientation to AI shapes AI transformation outcomes, and it offers a practical framework for aligning leadership approach with AI maturity and strategic intent.

Strategy and Leadership
Luleå University of Technology (SE), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.