Performance Implications of Divergent Shell Size Preferences and Exoskeleton Mass of Two Closely Related Hermit Crabs

Hermit crabs use gastropod shells for protection from abiotic stressors and predators. However, two sympatric species of hermit crab, <i>Pagurus hirsutiusculus</i> and <i>Pagurus granosimanus</i>, have divergent shell size preferences. Differences in shell size use were evident in the field: for a given body mass, <i>P. granosimanus</i> used shells that were 136%-300% larger than <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i>. The present study examined the possible morphological adaptations associated with the shell size preferences of <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> and <i>P. granosimanus</i> as well as the costs and benefits associated with the preference of <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> for shells that are too small to enclose and protect the entire body of the crab. When exposed to desiccation conditions commonly encountered during low tide emersion, <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> using large shells survived much longer than individuals using small shells. And in motility trials, <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> moved significantly faster when using a small shell than when using a large shell. It was therefore hypothesized that <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> might produce a heavier exoskeleton than <i>P. granosimanus</i> to compensate for the reduced protection obtained by <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> from small shells. Our findings support this hypothesis: relative to body mass, the carapace was 15%-90% heavier in <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> than in <i>P. granosimanus</i>, a difference further confirmed by the claw mass, which was 59%-81% heavier in <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> than in <i>P. granosimanus</i>. The use of larger shells in <i>P. granosimanus</i> provides enhanced protection, allowing for the production of a lighter exoskeleton, but likely imposes reduced motility and increased energetic cost. <i>Pagurus hirsutiusculus</i>, on the other hand, uses smaller, lighter shells that impose lesser energetic costs and allow greater motility but leave the animal more vulnerable to stressors; <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> compensates for this increased vulnerability by producing a heavier carapace and claws. The differences in shell size and exoskeleton mass suggest ecological implications for these species, particularly with regard to microhabitat use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73044
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Implications of Divergent Shell Size Preferences and Exoskeleton Mass of Two Closely Related Hermit Crabs

Chloe Maclean, Louis A. Gosselin
Ecology and Evolution
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Performance Implications of Divergent Shell Size Preferences and Exoskeleton Mass of Two Closely Related Hermit Crabs

Chloe Maclean, Louis A. Gosselin
article en

Abstract

Hermit crabs use gastropod shells for protection from abiotic stressors and predators. However, two sympatric species of hermit crab, <i>Pagurus hirsutiusculus</i> and <i>Pagurus granosimanus</i>, have divergent shell size preferences. Differences in shell size use were evident in the field: for a given body mass, <i>P. granosimanus</i> used shells that were 136%-300% larger than <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i>. The present study examined the possible morphological adaptations associated with the shell size preferences of <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> and <i>P. granosimanus</i> as well as the costs and benefits associated with the preference of <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> for shells that are too small to enclose and protect the entire body of the crab. When exposed to desiccation conditions commonly encountered during low tide emersion, <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> using large shells survived much longer than individuals using small shells. And in motility trials, <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> moved significantly faster when using a small shell than when using a large shell. It was therefore hypothesized that <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> might produce a heavier exoskeleton than <i>P. granosimanus</i> to compensate for the reduced protection obtained by <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> from small shells. Our findings support this hypothesis: relative to body mass, the carapace was 15%-90% heavier in <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> than in <i>P. granosimanus</i>, a difference further confirmed by the claw mass, which was 59%-81% heavier in <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> than in <i>P. granosimanus</i>. The use of larger shells in <i>P. granosimanus</i> provides enhanced protection, allowing for the production of a lighter exoskeleton, but likely imposes reduced motility and increased energetic cost. <i>Pagurus hirsutiusculus</i>, on the other hand, uses smaller, lighter shells that impose lesser energetic costs and allow greater motility but leave the animal more vulnerable to stressors; <i>P. hirsutiusculus</i> compensates for this increased vulnerability by producing a heavier carapace and claws. The differences in shell size and exoskeleton mass suggest ecological implications for these species, particularly with regard to microhabitat use.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(2)
Thompson Rivers University (CA)
Thompson Rivers University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.