In-vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam Against Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a major therapeutic challenge in tertiary-care settings, necessitating local, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) -anchored susceptibility data for empiric therapy and stewardship. This study characterises Ceftazidime– Avibactam (CZA) activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) distribution to support stewardship and local guideline updates Aim: To evaluate the in-vitro activity of CZA against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a tertiary care hospital in North India. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based, crosssectional study conducted in the Bacteriology Division, Postgraduate Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from January 2022 to December 2022 and included 108 non duplicate MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Standardised workflows encompassed specimen culture and identification, Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion, and ceftazidime-avibactam MIC determination by E-test interpreted per CLSI M100 (2022), while demographic parameters recorded for context included age group and gender. Susceptibility was reported as proportions, and predictors of CZA non susceptibility were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Ceftazidime-Avibactam susceptibility was 63/108 (58.38%) and exceeded most β-lactam comparators, while aztreonam showed the highest susceptibility at 98/108 (90.74%). The MIC distribution clustered at 2-8 µg/mL with a peak at 8 µg/ mL. In multivariable modelling, burn diagnosis {adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)=2.15; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.05-4.41}, carbapenem non susceptibility (aOR=2.72; 95% CI 1.34-5.51), and ceftazidime non susceptibility (aOR=2.08; 95% CI 1.01- 4.29) independently predicted CZA non susceptibility. Conclusion: Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active among core antipseudomonal β-lactams, while aztreonam showed the highest overall susceptibility. The MIC histogram peaked at 8 µg/mL, with most isolates clustering between 2-8 µg/mL. Burn diagnosis, carbapenem non susceptibility, and ceftazidime non susceptibility independently predicted CZA non susceptibility

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/82000.22707
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam Against Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Seema Aleem, HUMAIRA BASHIR, Shoaib Mohmad Khan, Sheikh Zainab
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

In-vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam Against Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Seema Aleem, HUMAIRA BASHIR, Shoaib Mohmad Khan, Sheikh Zainab
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a major therapeutic challenge in tertiary-care settings, necessitating local, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) -anchored susceptibility data for empiric therapy and stewardship. This study characterises Ceftazidime– Avibactam (CZA) activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) distribution to support stewardship and local guideline updates Aim: To evaluate the in-vitro activity of CZA against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a tertiary care hospital in North India. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based, crosssectional study conducted in the Bacteriology Division, Postgraduate Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from January 2022 to December 2022 and included 108 non duplicate MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Standardised workflows encompassed specimen culture and identification, Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion, and ceftazidime-avibactam MIC determination by E-test interpreted per CLSI M100 (2022), while demographic parameters recorded for context included age group and gender. Susceptibility was reported as proportions, and predictors of CZA non susceptibility were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Ceftazidime-Avibactam susceptibility was 63/108 (58.38%) and exceeded most β-lactam comparators, while aztreonam showed the highest susceptibility at 98/108 (90.74%). The MIC distribution clustered at 2-8 µg/mL with a peak at 8 µg/ mL. In multivariable modelling, burn diagnosis {adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)=2.15; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.05-4.41}, carbapenem non susceptibility (aOR=2.72; 95% CI 1.34-5.51), and ceftazidime non susceptibility (aOR=2.08; 95% CI 1.01- 4.29) independently predicted CZA non susceptibility. Conclusion: Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active among core antipseudomonal β-lactams, while aztreonam showed the highest overall susceptibility. The MIC histogram peaked at 8 µg/mL, with most isolates clustering between 2-8 µg/mL. Burn diagnosis, carbapenem non susceptibility, and ceftazidime non susceptibility independently predicted CZA non susceptibility

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.