Psychometric properties and validation of short health literacy screening (SHLS) to identify low health literacy

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of the short health literacy screening (SHLS) to identify people with low health literacy among a set of Iranian adults in Mashhad and Shiraz. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants were 18-65 years old Iranian adults randomly selected from two major cities of Iran, encompassing inpatients, outpatients, and healthy individuals. They completed the demographic, SHLS, and Health Literacy for Iranian Adults (HELIA) questionnaires. Psychometric properties of SHLS were evaluated. We investigated the performance of screening questions for detecting inadequate and limited health literacy based on HELIA as a comparison standard. Results: SHLS had acceptable psychometric properties (Content validity index of 0.92, 0.78, 0.85, and 0.85, Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient of 0.827, 0.928, 0.581, and 0.712 for four questions, and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.713). Of 547 participants, 339 (62%) were female, and 415 (75.9%) were between 18 and 45 years old. The prevalence of inadequate and limited health literacy based on HELIA was 56 (10.2%) and 192 (35.1%), respectively. The question "How well do you understand the medical prescriptions your doctor told you?" (Comprehension of Prescriptions) showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.690 (0.620-0.759) for inadequate, and 0.666 (0.619-0.713) for limited health literacy. The combination of "How confident are you filling out forms by yourself?" and "Comprehension of Prescriptions" showed a better AUROC of 0.705 (0.638-0.773) for inadequate health literacy. All questions together had a higher AUROC of 0.683 (0.636-0.729) for limited health literacy. The response "Quite a bit" or less confident for "Comprehension of Prescriptions" increased the odds of inadequate and limited health literacy by 1.45- and 1.53-fold, respectively. Conclusion: The question "Comprehension of Prescriptions" and the four-item SHLS could identify people with low health literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Perspectives
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.025.44250
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties and validation of short health literacy screening (SHLS) to identify low health literacy

Mohammad Sayari, Mina Zarei, Marzieh Rahimi, S. AmirAli Gh. Ghahramani et al.
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Psychometric properties and validation of short health literacy screening (SHLS) to identify low health literacy

Mohammad Sayari, Mina Zarei, Marzieh Rahimi, S. AmirAli Gh. Ghahramani, Ali Ardekani, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan
article en

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of the short health literacy screening (SHLS) to identify people with low health literacy among a set of Iranian adults in Mashhad and Shiraz. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants were 18-65 years old Iranian adults randomly selected from two major cities of Iran, encompassing inpatients, outpatients, and healthy individuals. They completed the demographic, SHLS, and Health Literacy for Iranian Adults (HELIA) questionnaires. Psychometric properties of SHLS were evaluated. We investigated the performance of screening questions for detecting inadequate and limited health literacy based on HELIA as a comparison standard. Results: SHLS had acceptable psychometric properties (Content validity index of 0.92, 0.78, 0.85, and 0.85, Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient of 0.827, 0.928, 0.581, and 0.712 for four questions, and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.713). Of 547 participants, 339 (62%) were female, and 415 (75.9%) were between 18 and 45 years old. The prevalence of inadequate and limited health literacy based on HELIA was 56 (10.2%) and 192 (35.1%), respectively. The question "How well do you understand the medical prescriptions your doctor told you?" (Comprehension of Prescriptions) showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.690 (0.620-0.759) for inadequate, and 0.666 (0.619-0.713) for limited health literacy. The combination of "How confident are you filling out forms by yourself?" and "Comprehension of Prescriptions" showed a better AUROC of 0.705 (0.638-0.773) for inadequate health literacy. All questions together had a higher AUROC of 0.683 (0.636-0.729) for limited health literacy. The response "Quite a bit" or less confident for "Comprehension of Prescriptions" increased the odds of inadequate and limited health literacy by 1.45- and 1.53-fold, respectively. Conclusion: The question "Comprehension of Prescriptions" and the four-item SHLS could identify people with low health literacy.

Health Promotion PerspectivesVol. 15(4)
Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (US), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Durham University (GB), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.