Ambivalent intersectional solidarity: Berlin’s LGBTIQ+ civil society alliances during the war in Ukraine

Abstract In this paper, we examine the formation and evolution of intersectional solidarity among LGBTIQ+ civil society organizations in Berlin responding to the war in Ukraine. Drawing on qualitative interviews with representatives from twelve organizations, we analyze how these groups mobilized to support queer Ukrainian refugees. Our theoretical contribution lies in advancing the concept of ambivalent intersectional solidarity, which captures the tensions and exclusions that arise even within seemingly unified solidarity efforts. We argue that solidarity cannot be assumed to be inherently inclusive simply because actors share one or more axes of identity (e.g., queerness). Instead, we show how intersectionality—as both a lived experience and an analytic lens—reveals the contested nature of solidarity in contexts marked by historical trauma and geopolitical asymmetries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaf083
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ambivalent intersectional solidarity: Berlin’s LGBTIQ+ civil society alliances during the war in Ukraine

Anonymous Author(s), Gökce Yurdakul
Journal of Refugee Studies
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Ambivalent intersectional solidarity: Berlin’s LGBTIQ+ civil society alliances during the war in Ukraine

Anonymous Author(s), Gökce Yurdakul
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine the formation and evolution of intersectional solidarity among LGBTIQ+ civil society organizations in Berlin responding to the war in Ukraine. Drawing on qualitative interviews with representatives from twelve organizations, we analyze how these groups mobilized to support queer Ukrainian refugees. Our theoretical contribution lies in advancing the concept of ambivalent intersectional solidarity, which captures the tensions and exclusions that arise even within seemingly unified solidarity efforts. We argue that solidarity cannot be assumed to be inherently inclusive simply because actors share one or more axes of identity (e.g., queerness). Instead, we show how intersectionality—as both a lived experience and an analytic lens—reveals the contested nature of solidarity in contexts marked by historical trauma and geopolitical asymmetries.

Journal of Refugee Studies
Cal Poly Humboldt (US), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ambivalent intersectional solidarity: Berlin’s LGBTIQ+ civil society alliances during the war in Ukraine — Anonymous Author(s), Gökce Yurdakul · Journal of Refugee Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS