Unravelling ordering decision biases in multi-echelon supply chain: development of the theoretical framework

Purpose Decision-makers’ behavioural tendencies and biases in an uncertain environment can impact inventory dynamics across the supply chain. This study investigates how human biases influence inventory ordering behaviour, particularly in selecting order quantities, shaping inventory dynamics across the supply chain. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in attribution theory from social psychology, this study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) of peer-reviewed academic papers published between 2002 and 2024 in top-tier journals. It uses an inductive theory-building SLR for the development of the theoretical framework. Findings Developed theoretical framework explains how decision-makers exhibit biases in inventory ordering decisions. The findings highlight the role of individual-level psychological antecedents as causal drivers of ordering-decision biases and contextual factors as moderators shaping the extent to which such biases result in overordering or underordering. Research limitations/implications The developed theoretical framework provides a foundation for future research on behavioural biases in inventory ordering under various decision contexts in supply chains. Originality/value It advances research in inventory decision-making by addressing a key gap in understanding how ordering decision biases develop at the level of the decision-maker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-07-2024-0267
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling ordering decision biases in multi-echelon supply chain: development of the theoretical framework

Mohd Sufiyan, Rajat Agrawal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Unravelling ordering decision biases in multi-echelon supply chain: development of the theoretical framework

Mohd Sufiyan, Rajat Agrawal
article en

Abstract

Purpose Decision-makers’ behavioural tendencies and biases in an uncertain environment can impact inventory dynamics across the supply chain. This study investigates how human biases influence inventory ordering behaviour, particularly in selecting order quantities, shaping inventory dynamics across the supply chain. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in attribution theory from social psychology, this study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) of peer-reviewed academic papers published between 2002 and 2024 in top-tier journals. It uses an inductive theory-building SLR for the development of the theoretical framework. Findings Developed theoretical framework explains how decision-makers exhibit biases in inventory ordering decisions. The findings highlight the role of individual-level psychological antecedents as causal drivers of ordering-decision biases and contextual factors as moderators shaping the extent to which such biases result in overordering or underordering. Research limitations/implications The developed theoretical framework provides a foundation for future research on behavioural biases in inventory ordering under various decision contexts in supply chains. Originality/value It advances research in inventory decision-making by addressing a key gap in understanding how ordering decision biases develop at the level of the decision-maker.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics ManagementVol. 56(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.