Effects of Different Reheating Methods on the Physicochemical Quality and Sensory Attributes of Precooked Beef

Abstract The study evaluated the quality, physicochemical stability, and sensory attributes of precooked beef (PCB) subjected to different reheating methods, including control (CP), boiling (RB), microwave (RM), air-frying (RF), roasting (RR), and steaming (RS), to identify reheating conditions that optimize flavor and texture while minimizing oxidative and nutritional degradation. Reheating significantly altered pH (6.63 ± 0.2 in CP vs. 6.18 ± 0.2 in RR), reheating loss (highest in RB: 12.57 ± 1.42%; lowest in RF: 8.49 ± 0.2%), and water-holding capacity (highest in RB: 29.63 ± 1.52%; lowest in RF: 37.11 ± 1.34%). Dry-heat treatments (RM, RF, and RR) produced darker surfaces (lower L *) and higher redness ( a *), accompanied by increased hardness and chewiness compared with RB and RS. Volatile profiling revealed substantial increases in lipid-derived aldehydes and Maillard-related pyrazines during RF and RR, which reached the highest levels across all treatments, whereas RB and RS suppressed secondary oxidation products. E-nose PCA effectively differentiated reheating methods, with dry-heat treatments exhibiting stronger odor sensor responses. The proximate composition of precooked beef meat differed significantly ( p < 0.05) between the different reheating techniques. Free amino acids increased substantially in RM, RF, and RR—particularly sweet- and umami-related FAAs—enhancing flavor potential. Oxidation indicators also varied markedly: TBARS values were lowest in CP (0.67 ± 0.01 mg MDA/kg) and highest in RR (1.32 ± 0.01 mg MDA/kg), carbonyls recorded lowest in CP (3.88 ± 0.2 nmol/g protein) and highest in RR (6.12 ± 0.3 mg nmol/g protein) At the same time, sulfhydryl content decreased most in RF (17.52 ± 0.6 nmol/g protein) and RR (15.26 ± 0.5 nmol/g protein). Sensory evaluation showed that RF and RR achieved the highest overall acceptability scores, driven by intensified aroma, color, and texture attributes. In conclusion, the moist-heat methods (boiling and steaming) preserved better physicochemical and oxidative stability, while dry-heat methods (roasting and air-frying) enhanced flavor and color at the expense of lipid and protein integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Biophysics
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-025-10091-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Different Reheating Methods on the Physicochemical Quality and Sensory Attributes of Precooked Beef

Nady Khairy Elbarbary, Neveen M. Abdelmotilib, Mohamed K. Dandrawy, Rania Samir Zaki
1 citations
Food Biophysics
Meat and Animal Product Quality
33.72
article

Effects of Different Reheating Methods on the Physicochemical Quality and Sensory Attributes of Precooked Beef

Nady Khairy Elbarbary, Neveen M. Abdelmotilib, Mohamed K. Dandrawy, Rania Samir Zaki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The study evaluated the quality, physicochemical stability, and sensory attributes of precooked beef (PCB) subjected to different reheating methods, including control (CP), boiling (RB), microwave (RM), air-frying (RF), roasting (RR), and steaming (RS), to identify reheating conditions that optimize flavor and texture while minimizing oxidative and nutritional degradation. Reheating significantly altered pH (6.63 ± 0.2 in CP vs. 6.18 ± 0.2 in RR), reheating loss (highest in RB: 12.57 ± 1.42%; lowest in RF: 8.49 ± 0.2%), and water-holding capacity (highest in RB: 29.63 ± 1.52%; lowest in RF: 37.11 ± 1.34%). Dry-heat treatments (RM, RF, and RR) produced darker surfaces (lower L *) and higher redness ( a *), accompanied by increased hardness and chewiness compared with RB and RS. Volatile profiling revealed substantial increases in lipid-derived aldehydes and Maillard-related pyrazines during RF and RR, which reached the highest levels across all treatments, whereas RB and RS suppressed secondary oxidation products. E-nose PCA effectively differentiated reheating methods, with dry-heat treatments exhibiting stronger odor sensor responses. The proximate composition of precooked beef meat differed significantly ( p < 0.05) between the different reheating techniques. Free amino acids increased substantially in RM, RF, and RR—particularly sweet- and umami-related FAAs—enhancing flavor potential. Oxidation indicators also varied markedly: TBARS values were lowest in CP (0.67 ± 0.01 mg MDA/kg) and highest in RR (1.32 ± 0.01 mg MDA/kg), carbonyls recorded lowest in CP (3.88 ± 0.2 nmol/g protein) and highest in RR (6.12 ± 0.3 mg nmol/g protein) At the same time, sulfhydryl content decreased most in RF (17.52 ± 0.6 nmol/g protein) and RR (15.26 ± 0.5 nmol/g protein). Sensory evaluation showed that RF and RR achieved the highest overall acceptability scores, driven by intensified aroma, color, and texture attributes. In conclusion, the moist-heat methods (boiling and steaming) preserved better physicochemical and oxidative stability, while dry-heat methods (roasting and air-frying) enhanced flavor and color at the expense of lipid and protein integrity.

Food BiophysicsVol. 21(1)
South Valley University (EG), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (EG), Aswan University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
33.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.